Channel
@AMSCUI_Journal_Club
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003059187053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AMSCUI_Journal_Club |
| Created | 2 October 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AMSCUI_Journal_Club |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 43 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 42 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 42 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 56.3% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 32.8% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧠 #Session_Review Our second session took a more presentation-focused turn, diving into the first chapter of Algorithms to Live By! You can now read the full session review here. ✨ A special thanks to Shayan Najafian for writing this review! 🏆 The Leaderboard has also been updated — check where you stand and keep earning those 💡Insight Points💡! 🪩 Join Us!
❤5
📢 No Sessions for the Next Two Weeks There won’t be any sessions for the next two weeks due to midterm exams. We’ll resume right after the exams with more insightful discussions! 💡 Good luck on your exams, everyone! 🍀
😭5❤1🍾1
Optimal Stopping (Session 2) Presentation Slides
❤3
Defining Intelligence (Session 1) Presentation Slides
❤4
📖 Journal Club - Session 2 This week’s session focused on the first chapter of Algorithms to Live By. A presentation exploring how computer science principles can guide everyday decisions. Though less of a discussion and more of a deep dive, it sparked plenty of curiosity and thoughtful reflections among the group! 🪩 Join Us!
🔥4
🎉 The second session of the AI Arc is happening! How Computer Science Helps Us Make Better Life Decisions: from Finding a Home or a Partner to Even a Parking Spot! 📘 Optimal Stopping: The Science of When to Stop Looking Based on the first chapter of "Algorithms to Live By" by Brian Christian & Tom Griffiths 🕐 Monday (Nov. 3rd), 11:45-12:30 📍 Faculty of Mathematics, University of Isfahan 👤 Presenter: Shayan Najafia…
❤3
🧠 #Session_Review Our first session kicked off with great discussions and thoughtful insights from everyone! You can now read the full session review here. 🏆 The Leaderboard has also been updated! check where you stand and keep those 💡Insight Points💡 coming! 📘 The Glossary section is still under development and will be available soon to make our references even clearer. 🪩 Join Us!
🔥4
✨ The first session of our Journal Club! A great start filled with insightful discussions, curious minds, and lots of energy. It’s exciting to see everyone come together to explore ideas, share perspectives, and learn collaboratively. this is just the beginning! 💡📚 🪩 Join Us!
🔥8
NotebookLM-Generated Audio Review of today's session's resource
❤5
🎉 The first session of the AI Arc is happening! We’ll begin our journey into Artificial Intelligence with a deep dive into how intelligence itself is defined: through human thought, rational action, and the early foundations of AI. 📘 Defining Intelligence: Human Thought, Rational Action, and the Birth of AI Based on the first chapter of “Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach” by Russell & Norvig 🕐 Monday (Oct.…
🔥7
The votes have spoken! Our next Journal Club arc is Artificial Intelligence. Join us as we explore how machines learn, reason, and create.
🔥5❤🔥1
A New Chapter Begins Soon! 📱 انجمن ریکا | کلابها | کانال ژورنال کلاب | ارتباط با ما
🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @AMSCUI_Journal_Club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 230,071 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AMCSUI Journal Club” (@AMSCUI_Journal_Club), 43 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMSCUI_Journal_Club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.