USTIDAN BOSIB BILIB OLILA ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป๐๐ป
โค1๐1๐1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ค1

Channel
@ALLBESTCODER
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001516735556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ALLBESTCODER |
| Description | ๐A=ALL โค๏ธโ๐ฅB=BEST ๐จโ๐ปC=CODER ๐บ๐ฟUZ=UZ #๐0DAN YUKSAKLIKGACHA Aแด แดษชษด: @WeB_HaKeR ๐จโ๐ป Aแด แดษชษด: @Dev_ake ๐จโ๐ป ๐ฟ Sแดแดแดสแดส Uแดสแดษด Bแดแด | @ABC_Spam_Bot ๐ค |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ALLBESTCODER |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 7 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 7 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 28 | 21.9% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 17 | 13.3% | |
| ๐ฅ | 17 | 13.3% | |
| โค | 12 | 9.38% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 7.03% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 6 | 4.69% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 6 | 4.69% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 3.91% | |
| ๐ | 5 | 3.91% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 3.13% | |
| ๐ซก | 4 | 3.13% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 2.34% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 2.34% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 1.56% | |
| ๐ฑ | 2 | 1.56% | |
| ๐คฉ | 2 | 1.56% | |
| ๐พ | 1 | 0.781% | |
| ๐ณ | 1 | 0.781% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2023 to 26 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
USTIDAN BOSIB BILIB OLILA ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป๐๐ป
โค1๐1๐1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ค1
DASTURLASH NIMA | DASTURCHI KIM DASTURLASH TILLARI NEGA KERAK DEGAN SAVOLLARGA ANIQ JAVOB๐จโ๐ป
โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ซก1
โORAMIZDA PHP ๐ซด๐ป NIMA EKANLIGINI๐ซฃ BILMAYDIGANLAR HAM BOR EKAN ๐ SHU SABAB KEYINGI POSTIMIZ๐๐ถโ๐ซ๏ธ PHP ๐ฃ HAQIDA BULADI ๐ซก๐ง๐ผโ๐ป ๐บ๐ฟABC.UZ๐บ๐ฟ ๐จโ๐ป @ALLBESTCODER ๐จโ๐ป
โคโ๐ฅ1๐พ1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐คฉ1
๐จ๐ผโ๐ป PHP BOT KODLARIDAN TASHAYLIKMI ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โ100 TA BO'LSAK FRONT-END๐ซถ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป DASTURLASH KURSINI BOSHLAYMIZ โ
๐1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ฅ1๐ค1๐ซก1๐1
โ ODAM๐ค QO'SHGANGA๐๐ผ PUBG AKK ๐ YOKI๐ NAKRUTKAโก๏ธ URUSHNI๐ URGATAMAN๐ง๐ผโ๐ป๐๐ป ๐๐ช๐ค ๐บ๐ฐ๐ป๐ช๐ญ๐ข | @Dev_Ake | ๐จโ๐ป ๐๐ฑ๐ข๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ด๐ข | Camment | ๐ค ๐๐ข ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ข๐ต ๐ฒ๐ช๐ญ๐ด๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ช๐ ๐บ๐ฟABC.UZ๐บ๐ฟ ๐จโ๐ป @ALLBESTCODER ๐จโ๐ป
โค1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ฅ1
โ KIMGA QANAQA YORDAM KERE BO'LSA๐ YOKI QANDAYDUR TAKLIFI BO'LSA๐ง๐ผโ๐ป #Camment_Yozamiz ๐ซก ๐บ๐ฟABC.UZ๐บ๐ฟ ๐จโ๐ป @ALLBESTCODER ๐จโ๐ป
โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ค1๐ซก1
OVOZ BERINGโ BU BIZ UCHUN MUHIM ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป๐
๐งโ๐ป๐ค SIZ DASTURCHIMISIZ ๐ค๐งโ๐ป
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐จโ๐ป1๐ฅ1๐ซก1
AKTIV KUTARAYLEK๐ฅฑ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป ERTADAN KANALDA UDAR NARSALAR BULADI๐ค๐
๐ฅ3โค1๐1๐จโ๐ป1
BIZ QAYTDEK ๐ซ ๐ง๐ผโ๐ป๐ซถ ๐บ๐ฟABC.UZ๐บ๐ฟ ๐จโ๐ป @ALLBESTCODER ๐จโ๐ป
โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1
WUNCHAKI REAKSIYA XOLOS โก ใ ค โใ ค โใ ค โฒ หกแถฆแตแต แถแตแตแตแตโฟแต หขแตแตแต หขสฐแตสณแต Biz Bilan Bir Qadam Oldindasiz!๐ โ Tanishlarga Ham Ulashing! ๐บ๐ฟABC.UZ๐บ๐ฟ ๐จโ๐ป @ALLBESTCODER
๐3๐ฅ3โค1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ALLBESTCODER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
๐จ๐ผโ๐ป PHP BOT KODLARIDAN TASHAYLIKMI ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐งโ๐ป๐ค SIZ DASTURCHIMISIZ ๐ค๐งโ๐ป
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
๐ป๐ญ๐น๐ถ๐ต๐ป๐ฌ๐ต๐ซ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฎ๐จ๐ต๐ฐ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐จ ๐ป๐จ๐๐๐ถ๐น๐ด๐ฐ๐บ๐ฐ๐ณ๐จโ
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2023 to 26 June 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 571,364 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ALLBESTCODER named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โABC UZ ๐บ๐ฟ | ALL-BEST-CODER๐ง๐ผโ๐ปโ (@ALLBESTCODER), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALLBESTCODER.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.