Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الأستاذ علي الساعدي

Channel

الأستاذ علي الساعدي

@ALIBIO66

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,168subscribers

-285 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171725830
TypeChannel
Username@ALIBIO66
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ALIBIO66

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,16813,45313,310.531 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,438 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,429 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,413 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,402 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,381 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,324 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,246 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,211 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,193 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,179 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,168 subscribers31 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 19 days, net -285. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,125–13,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:3613,168-11
16 Sept 2026, 23:3913,179-14
14 Sept 2026, 23:2013,193-18
13 Sept 2026, 11:5713,211-35
11 Sept 2026, 13:5913,246-78
9 Sept 2026, 00:1813,324-57
5 Sept 2026, 16:3613,381-21
3 Sept 2026, 14:5813,402-11
2 Sept 2026, 05:3413,413-16
1 Sept 2026, 07:3813,429-9
31 Aug 2026, 09:5313,438-15
31 Aug 2026, 00:3013,453first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.61%
avg views ÷ 13,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
344
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.581%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 January 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total344
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

366 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥18550.5%
🔥7520.5%
💯6718.3%
⚡297.92%
🙏61.64%
👌41.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ALIBIO66. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC344 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/lJQ8cQ-Ua6A?si=8Bub0mUzb7OvVLQL الدرس التاسع

💯2

26 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC629 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/RIFGyMxLCLI?si=woG5lRoJHpaiaRet الدرس الثامن ♥️

🔥3

23 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC763 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/Mg_xWWA7ltQ?si=FNL43ITyLuy_papM الدرس السابع ♥️

💯4

21 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC891 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/0M0kJBYbAew?si=elYp9oKteLZMaOBr رجعنا 🤍 الدرس السادس

👌4

27 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈1,570 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/NJkt0aFtUvw?si=vEzYgekMYX2RT7_m الدرس الخامس🤍

🔥4💯3❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,830 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/VO8JjQNXfQI?si=s3H5q8XR7wY9fDgJ الدرس الرابع 🤍

❤‍🔥5

14 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,990 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/QRKtZEsob9Q?si=QZsDb4L0e_XEGELD الدرس الثالث 🤍

❤‍🔥5⚡1

13 Jul 2026, 22:55 UTC≈1,830 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

طلاب اليوتيوب الأبطال ما ناسيكم وجاي اجهزلكم المحاضرات بأقوى شرح ان شاء الله وراح ابدي وياكم نظام أمتحانات لكل 3 محاضرات امتحان 🤍

❤‍🔥6⚡1

13 Jul 2026, 22:51 UTC≈1,830 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

الطلاب المسجلين والراغبين بالتسجيل في الدورة الألكترونية مراسلتي على المعرف : @BIO1AM

❤‍🔥5⚡2

11 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,080 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/K9MoWSkKxC4?si=6atv5veZLiJaXjr_ الدرس الثاني 🤍

🔥3

5 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC≈2,330 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/6I9pED498Qk?si=gM9nGiTlph03Zm5A الدرس الأول

🔥2

20 May 2026, 18:58 UTC≈4,910 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

قناة اليوتيوب الجديدة 👇 https://www.youtube.com/@ali1bio

❤‍🔥4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ALIBIO66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شبكة فالكون التعليمية 𖡃
@FDBBB · 38,419
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
وظائف و تعيينات العراق 24
@iraqjobs24 · 46,515
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الأستاذ علي الساعدي” (@ALIBIO66), 13,168 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALIBIO66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.