Тестирую OPUS 5 который по цифрам круче FABLE и GPT 5.6 Сильное заявление - сейчас проверим
🤬2👍1

Channel
@AIromulus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
853subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001395217962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIromulus |
| Created | Between 1 September 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIromulus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 853 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 847 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 849 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 850 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
280 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 97 | 34.6% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 31.4% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 9.64% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 9.29% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 7.50% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 3.57% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.357% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.357% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2024 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тестирую OPUS 5 который по цифрам круче FABLE и GPT 5.6 Сильное заявление - сейчас проверим
🤬2👍1
Новый ИИ KIMI K3 и Qwen 3.8 убил США GPT 5.6 SOL и FABLE 5! Китайцы ПОБЕДИЛИ? 😮 Парни пожалуйста поставьте видео на проигрывание до самого конца! Это очень важно для алгоритмов ютуба😎 Всех благодарю за поддержку 👉 https://youtu.be/WCbXBclTXoU
😁2🤬1
6 часов после релиза #FABLE 5 спалил 40% недельного лимита на самой маскимаоьной подписке #Claude Такая лайф пацаны @AIromulus
👎2
Как Anthropic шпионит за тобой через Claude Code🎹 Anthropic встроила в #ClaudeCode скрытый код, похожий на spyware, который тайно таргетирует китайских пользователей😃 Дальше самое интересное: Claude Code якобы передаёт информацию о пользователе, подмешивая её прямо в prompt message. В system prompt могут попадать данные вроде timezone, proxy и возможных связей с AI Lab - причём так, что пользователь этого не видит…
❤2👎1🔥1
Так парни, наконец-то нашлось время для ютуб роликов по AI Скоро первый гайд по ClaudeCode - надеюсь вы ждете😏
👍9👎5🤬1
ЛОЛ, кто скзаал, что Claude за 200$ невозможно загнать в лимит? Мне понадобилось всего 2 дня ЛОЛ
🤬2
Отлично пацаны, тогда делаю видео для вас! Если лайков под видос накидываете, будет отдельная рубрика по AI и как на этом рубить кеш
👍24🔥10❤5🤬1
Огоньки растут, значит нужно готовит для вас сетап по #Polymarket?
👍16🔥4🤬1
Вот так сейчас выглядят ТОП тимы по трейдингу / полимаркету Дать сетап на Polymarket который приносит автоматом по 800-1300$ в месяц? При этом стоит 30$😮 Жми 🔥 и публикую @AIromulus
🔥69👍3🎉2
Парни, тут теперь буду писать про AI AI модели | Автоматизация в крипто | workflow без кода Будет очень интересно! Так что пожалуйста делитесь со своими друзьями @AIromulus
👎5🔥4
Прикиньте, этому каналу уже 4 года! Надеюсь вы не только постарели на 4 года, но и заработали😏
😁8👎7❤3
Надеюсь вы поняли, что на фото рандомный тип с интернета а не Я?😅
🤔5👎3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AIromulus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROMULUS AI” (@AIromulus), 853 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIromulus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.