Channel
@AIpromptimage
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Cite this entry
7,227subscribers
+183 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001885460303 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIpromptimage |
| Description | Here you will find daily AI Image Prompts that guarante accurate and unique images for Midjourney, DALL-E, and Gemini. 🖼️ Keywords Included : #AIimageprompts, Prompts, AI Art, Prompt Engineering. Promotion/Collaboration Contact : ↪️ @Debashis098 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIpromptimage |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:20 | 7,227 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 7,225 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 7,233 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 7,236 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 7,233 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 7,228 | +12 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 7,216 | +11 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 7,205 | +42 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 7,163 | -4 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 7,167 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 7,180 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 7,172 | +13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 7,159 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:13 | 7,160 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 7,155 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 7,159 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 7,146 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 7,125 | +16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 7,109 | +14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 7,095 | first reading |
46 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (25 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 20,673 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 13:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
111 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 87.4% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.50% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.60% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.901% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.901% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AIpromptimage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌠 Use the attached face reference: exact same face, features and natural skin tone, only the hairstyle changes. Vertical 4:6 three-quarter portrait. A young man stands against a textured slate-grey wall with an ornate vintage black lantern at the top right. He wears an off-white kurta with maroon embroidered paisley motifs and a red placket, sleeves rolled, one hand in his pocket, with a warm natural smile. Curly me…
Posted without readable text
Low-angle candid photo of a young man sitting on wide dark slate steps beside a white wall with a diagonal metal handrail. Both hands pull down the brim of an olive green baseball cap with a white embroidered NY-style monogram, covering his eyes, chin and stubble visible. Olive knit pullover draped over his shoulders, plain white oversized tee, loose olive baggy pants, black high-sole canvas sneakers with white platf…
❤2
I found great way to earn money 💸🤩 Get instant ₹170 when you download this app! Earn an extra ₹200 for every referral and withdraw it directly to your bank account—check out these proof screenshots from users who are already cashing out. https://filmm.me/4kPOU7m4 And you can also watch any movies, web series or animes.🎞https://filmm.me/4kPOU7m4
🤯1
Vertical 3-panel stacked photo collage, moody dark urban tone, desaturated grey palette, same man in all panels. Top panel: close crop from lips to waist, head tilted down, grey cap, fluffy grey sherpa overshirt over a light grey tee, pearl bead chain necklace, thin white earphone wire hanging, dark glass building with vertical slats behind. Middle panel: full-body, standing on wide dark stone steps beside a metal ha…
Prompt ❄
🏞🔍 Use the uploaded reference photo for exact face identity: keep the same face, hairstyle, skin tone and facial hair unchanged. He leans on a weathered wooden railing at a Himalayan tea-estate viewpoint, looking at the misty green valley with a calm peaceful expression. Outfit: chunky cream woollen sweater, dark brown full-length trousers, brown leather boots. Clean sans-serif text in white at the top centre: "Unplu…
🌅 Use the uploaded reference photo for exact face identity: keep the same face, hairstyle, skin tone and facial hair unchanged. He sits on the edge of a rooftop terrace wall at dusk, eyes gently closed, head tilted slightly up, white wired earphones in, both hands lightly moving to the rhythm of the music, peaceful smile. Outfit: white oversized full-sleeve cotton shirt, sleeves rolled, black full-length wide-leg tr…
Ultra-realistic portrait photo of a stylish young Indian man standing in front of a lush flowering vine wall filled with small white jasmine flowers and green leaves. The man has thick wavy black hair, light trimmed beard, smooth wheatish skin tone and sharp facial features. He is wearing a minimal off-white oversized t-shirt and matching light cream pants with a gold wristwatch. He poses naturally while holding a sm…
❤1
🌼
❤1
Use this reference Image Faces seme Ultra-realistic cinematic portrait of a young Indian man leaning casually against a glossy black SUV parked on a roadside surrounded by lush green trees. The man has short curly black hair, a light trimmed beard, and medium wheatish skin tone. He is wearing an olive green checkered button-down shirt with sleeves rolled up and clean white trousers, along with a silver wristwatch. Hi…
Prompt🎴
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @AIpromptimage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 5 posts on @AIpromptimage as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI Prompts Only ♊” (@AIpromptimage), 7,227 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIpromptimage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.