11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -320. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,955–46,371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:52
46,003
-37
14 Aug 2026, 13:38
46,040
-27
13 Aug 2026, 06:29
46,067
-40
12 Aug 2026, 05:12
46,107
-28
11 Aug 2026, 04:01
46,135
-41
10 Aug 2026, 00:30
46,176
-43
9 Aug 2026, 00:53
46,219
-28
8 Aug 2026, 00:51
46,247
-40
7 Aug 2026, 00:40
46,287
-36
6 Aug 2026, 01:47
46,323
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
46,323
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
913
Videos
49
Links
914
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
190 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
142
74.7%
🔥
16
8.42%
👍
13
6.84%
🤩
7
3.68%
🍾
5
2.63%
🙏
3
1.58%
❤🔥
2
1.05%
🏆
2
1.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 7 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AIVille_Ann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2025 to 7 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🗓 AIVille Update Announcement | Version 6.7.5
⏰ Update Time: November 7, 2025 – 07:00 UTC
🛠 Estimated Downtime: 60 minutes
Dear residents,
To maintain the fairness and integrity of AIVille’s ecosystem, we will be performing key system maintenance and adjustments during this update.
🧾 1. Asset Reset for Approved Sybil Appeal Accounts
This maintenance includes an asset reset for users who were previously banned as “…
🛠️ Banned but still wanna build on AIVille?
✅ Have you already applied for your ONE & ONLY account reset yet? [Account Reset Application Form]
⏳24h only
🎁10 Lucky Keys × 20 winners
💬 Drop your answer + UID with #AIVille & #AIV in [THIS TWEET] comments NOW!
📱 https://x.com/aivillebot/status/1986328794811302386
Website |Channel | Chat | Twitter | Discord | Game | Airdrop
🧠 AIVille IQ Test: Who’s the Smartest in Town?
📅 Nov 6 , 12:00 UTC
🎁 100 Lucky Keys For 10 Winners
👾 How to Join:
1️⃣ Follow @AIVille_Official & @AIVille_Ann
2️⃣ Be in #General Chat at the right time
3️⃣ React fast, think even faster. No second chances.
⚔️ This isn’t just a quiz—it’s a battle of wits.
🧩 May the sharpest mind in town take the crown!
Website |Channel | Chat | Twitter | Discord | Game | Airdrop
💬 AIVille-Indonesia – Kuis setiap Rabu
Kamu merasa mengenal AIVille dengan baik?
Jadilah salah satu dari lima orang pertama yang menjawab "Kuis" dengan benar untuk kesempatan berbagi 50 kunci keberuntungan! 🤑
📅 Tanggal: Rabu, 5 November 2025
⏰ Waktu: 12:00 UTC
🔖 Lokasi: Tg AIVille General
🏆 Tantangan: 10 pertanyaan [berkaitan dengan AIVille]
✅ Persyaratan kelayakan:
1️⃣ Ikuti @AIVille_Official & @AIVille_Ann
2️⃣ …
🧠 AIVille IQ Test: Who’s the Smartest in Town?
📅 Nov 4, 12:00 UTC
🎁 10,000 Piggy Chests For 10 Winners
👾 How to Join:
1️⃣ Follow @AIVille_Official & @AIVille_Ann
2️⃣ Be in #General Chat at the right time
3️⃣ React fast, think even faster. No second chances.
⚔️ This isn’t just a quiz—it’s a battle of wits.
🧩 May the sharpest mind in town take the crown!
Website |Channel | Chat | Twitter | Discord | Game | Airdrop
AIVille Weekly Report | Oct 27 – Nov 2 , 2025
[AIVille Highlights]
🔥 AIV withdrawal window is now closed — players can transfer AIV from their Game Wallet to the Official Website Wallet
🔥 AIVille x @xworld_ai Halloween Bash has officially ended.
🔥 The $AIV In-Game → On-Chain transfer screenshot event has ended
🔥 The Halloween Special Giveaway “Trick or Treat” offers 15 Lucky Keys per person and ends on Nov 3 at 12…
📢 AIVille Account Reset Application for Banned Users
Hey AIVille Residents,
Over the past few days, we’ve received countless heartfelt messages from community members — and we’ve heard you loud and clear.
Many of you have asked for one more chance — not just to recover your account, but to continue contributing to the growth and future of AIVille. We believe in second chances — and in giving real players the oppor…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AIVille_Ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 508,939 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AIVille_Ann named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@aiville_official named in 94 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
@citojitu named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
@xworld_ai named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AIVille Ann” (@AIVille_Ann), 46,003 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIVille_Ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
