Channel
@AIT_Chain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
195,108subscribers
-829 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001804699150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIT_Chain |
| Description | Have hacked |
| Created | 17 February 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIT_Chain |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:21 | 195,108 | -234 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 195,342 | -161 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 195,503 | -186 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 195,689 | -177 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 195,866 | -71 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 195,937 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 17 February 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,645 reactions across 2 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 790 | 48.0% | |
| 👍 | 288 | 17.5% | |
| ❤ | 203 | 12.3% | |
| 👀 | 119 | 7.23% | |
| 🆒 | 41 | 2.49% | |
| 🐳 | 40 | 2.43% | |
| ✍ | 31 | 1.88% | |
| 🫡 | 28 | 1.70% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 1.46% | |
| 🎅 | 23 | 1.40% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 0.973% | |
| 🏆 | 15 | 0.912% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2023 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
We will do whatever it takes, even at the cost of our lives, to catch the hackers. Now is the time for all members to unite.
😁443👍159❤124👀66🐳28🫡28🆒25✍21
AIT chain has been hacked. We are tracking the hacker address. We will release the hacker identity and details when we have progress.
😁347👍129❤79👀53🎅23🆒16🏆15🥰13
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @AIT_Chain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 325,515 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AIT Chain” (@AIT_Chain), 195,108 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIT_Chain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.