Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐‘จ๐‘ฐ๐‘น ๐‘ญ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ช๐‘ฌ ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ฎ๐‘จ๐‘ต๐‘ฐ๐’๐‘จ๐‘ป๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘ต ๐Ÿ‘‘

@AIR_FORCEEE

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1,086subscribers

+604 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403989009
TypeChannel
Username@AIR_FORCEEE
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AIR_FORCEEE

Growth

4821,0867846 August 2026 โ€” 482 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 482 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 546 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 1,086 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +604. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 391โ€“1,177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:271,086+540
7 Aug 2026, 12:18546+64
6 Aug 2026, 19:50482no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:49482first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
9.92%
avg views รท 1,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 2026 โ€“ 6 August 2026)
Views total1,939
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 53527323570549631482952.7%
customย 5443034181892336817712.7%
customย 5381861022824945959610.9%
customย 5400107285143897312610.9%
customย 542250650166521011859.09%
customย 523347518126295185811.82%
customย 544515318990716034811.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for ยท 28%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @AIR_FORCEEE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC39 viewsread 6 August 2026

+1 ัƒะปัŒั‚ ะฟัƒัˆ ั€ะฐะฝะณ๐ŸŒŸ

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC93 viewsread 6 August 2026

๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜

5 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC107 views4 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™ ัƒั‡ะฐัั‚ะฒัƒะนั‚ะต ั€ะตะฑัั‚ะฐ ๐Ÿ’ต

customย 53527323570549631482customย 54001072851438973121customย 54225065016652101181

5 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC129 viewsread 6 August 2026

โœ๏ธโœ๏ธโœ๏ธโœ๏ธ

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC121 views3 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉโฌ…๏ธะฃัะฟะตะน ะฟะพัƒั‡ะฐัั‚ะฒะพะฒะฐั‚ัŒ โžก๏ธ๐Ÿค‘

customย 53818610228249459591customย 54001072851438973121customย 54225065016652101181

5 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC97 views3 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

๐Ÿ’—๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ’— โœจ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ฎ๐œ ๐Ÿ’ต โœจ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ฎ๐œ ๐Ÿ’ต โœจ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ฎ๐œ ๐Ÿ’ต โœจ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ฎ๐œ ๐Ÿ’ต โœจ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ๐ฎ๐œ ๐Ÿ’ต ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ะžะฑะพะฒสผัะทะบะพะฒะฐ ะฟั–ะดะฟะธัะบะฐ ะฝะฐ ั‚ะณะบโฌ‡๏ธ ๐ŸŒŸ๐•๐ˆ๐’๐“๐„๐‘๐ˆ๐€ ๐’๐‡๐Ž๐ ๐ŸŒŸ๐๐”๐๐† ๐Œ๐Ž๐๐ˆ๐‹๐„ | ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐”๐€ ๐ŸŒŸ๐๐”๐๐† ๐Œ๐Ž๐๐ˆ๐‹๐„ | ๐๐ž๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐”๐€ ๐ŸŒŸะ ะตะทัƒะปัŒั‚ะฐั‚ะธ: ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”:๐ŸŽ๐ŸŽ ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ–.๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ–.๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”

customย 52334751812629518581customย 54001072851438973121customย 54451531899071603481

3 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC96 views3 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

ะœะฐะบัะธะผะฐะปัŒะฝั‹ะต ั€ะตะฟะพัั‚ั‹ ั€ะตะฑัั‚ะฐ!!! ๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’™

customย 53527323570549631481customย 53818610228249459591customย 54225065016652101181

3 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC760 views19 reactions25 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ 7๏ธโƒฃ2๏ธโƒฃ0๏ธโƒฃ ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ ๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต๐Ÿฉต ๐Ÿ’œะ ะพะทั‹ะณั€ะฐัˆ ะฟะพ 720 UC ะดะฒัƒะผ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัั‡ะธะบะฐะผ ะพั‚ ะบะปะฐะฝะฐ : ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒŸ ะ”ะปั ัƒั‡ะฐัั‚ะธั ะฝัƒะถะฝะพ ะฒั‹ะฟะพะปะฝะธั‚ัŒ ะฒัะตะณะพ ะดะฒะฐ ะทะฐะดะฐะฝะธั โค๏ธ -ะ‘ั‹ั‚ัŒ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะฐะฝะฝั‹ะผ ะฝะฐ ัะฟะพะฝัะพั€ะพะฒ -ะฟะพัั‚ะฐะฒะธั‚ัŒ ั€ะตะฐะบั†ะธัŽ ะฝะฐ 2 ะฟั€ะพัˆะปั‹ั… ะฟัƒะฑะปะธะบะฐั†ะธะธ โšก๏ธ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผ๐ŸŒผโšก๏ธ ๐Ÿฉต https://t.me/AIR_FORCEEE ๐Ÿฉต https://t.me/pubgchatua ๐Ÿ‘‘ะ ะตะทัƒะปัŒั‚ะฐั‚ั‹ 10.08๐Ÿ‘‘

customย 53527323570549631487customย 54430341818923368174customย 53818610228249459593customย 54001072851438973123customย 54225065016652101182

3 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

customย 53527323570549631485customย 53818610228249459591

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AIR_FORCEEE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 55,811 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘จ๐‘ฐ๐‘น ๐‘ญ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ช๐‘ฌ ๐‘ถ๐‘น๐‘ฎ๐‘จ๐‘ต๐‘ฐ๐’๐‘จ๐‘ป๐‘ฐ๐‘ถ๐‘ต ๐Ÿ‘‘โ€ (@AIR_FORCEEE), 1,086 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIR_FORCEEE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.