Channel
@AGiCB66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,565subscribers
+165 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004464441573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AGiCB66 |
| Created | 12 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AGiCB66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 1,565 | +66 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 1,499 | +81 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 1,418 | +18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 1,400 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (12 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,663 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
41 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 46.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 39.0% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道！ ❤️以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 1️⃣仁济改文件. 2️⃣小月改文件. 3️⃣HTY改文件. 4️⃣公益内核破解. 5️⃣TG高速公益代理. 6️⃣期九期改文件. 以下为互推赞助商⬇️ 惩戒他人,保护自己 开户查档专用软件 100%秒出14亿全国人口数据库/免费开户. ⚠️户籍猎手已公益 低价源头1元TG账号 快手账号 QQ账号 抖音账号 微信账号 库存充足 发誓要让小学生用上质量的账号
👍1
⚠️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ ♥️秋辞互推挑战全网最强互管 100人以上都可以参与🔤 ✉️你还在求爷爷告奶奶找别人要神秘代码吗？ 🔗一键加入📱优质频道 🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰🇸🇰 本人频道 1️⃣飞天稳定战神的直装 2️⃣无敌高跳最强改文件 3️⃣实体美化最强改文件 PUBG账号源头卡网 ⬇️ https://4xg.66url.cn/qhN 加入互推要求 频道1k+ 机器人 @QIUCIHUTUIBOT 🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️ ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ (如果你加入了其他文件夹 请尽快退出 都是诈骗！)
👍1
🇨🇳功能：下载文件后，在配料表查看 ❗️密码：密码也在文件里，下载打开查看 反馈给机器人：https://t.me/agdfsbot
❤3👍2
阿古低价🛬卡网🔊 🇮🇳+91注册2016～2026=3💰 随机国家=1.30💰 🇮🇳+91 双向号=0.9💰 🇺🇸+1注册2~6月=2.8💰 点我一键直达卡网❗️ 点我一键直达卡网❗️ 点我一键直达卡网❗️ 仅剩最后几张，先到先得 感谢支持🙏
👍3❤2
🇨🇳阿古公益拦截2.0🇨🇳 更新内容：💯解决无网络问题，增加新规则❗️ [内置规则] ✅防大厅人脸 ✅局内人脸 ✅防隔离 ✅防小黑屋 ✅防十年 ✅防客户端 ✅防禁网 🤤可防辅助: ✅内核 ✅直装 ✅注入 ✅文件 免费领💰活动 免费领💰活动 免费领💰活动 🔔使用方法 ①大厅加载页面开启✅ ②登录加载页面开启✅ ③桌面开启✅ 发布频道：@AGiCB66 反馈发给机器人:https://t.me/agdfsbot
❤5😎1
🆘你还在担心你的频道没时间管理吗 只需要一个管理位我就可以帮你管理频道 🔔 🔊阿古全网互推💯 门槛低🫡 是个频道即可参加😍 点我一键加入高质量频道❗️ 点我一键加入高质量频道❗️ 点我一键加入高质量频道❗️ 🚀高效上人速度/免费引流🚥 🔊让你的频道获得更多浏览量 此消息一小时后可删 🛑参加互推🔜点我一键联系参与互推
👍2😱2❤1🤔1
🇨🇳阿古ADG拦截🇨🇳 [内置规则] ✅防大厅人脸 ✅局内人脸 ✅防隔离 ✅防小黑屋 🤤可防辅助: ✅内核 ✅直装 ✅注入 ✅文件 免费领💰活动 免费领💰活动 免费领💰活动 🔔使用方法 ①:登录跑小人时开启 ②:大厅加载页面开启 发布频道：@AGiCB66 反馈发给机器人:https://t.me/agdfsbot
👍3❤1
💯活动①：快手发作品，领💷 ①.发作品1000播放量+15❤️=3.88💰 ②.发作品2000播放量+25❤️=6.88💰 ③.发作品3000播放量+50❤️=8.88💰 一个作品领一次❗️❗️❗️ 🫡前提条件↓ ①话题带有[#阿古拦截] ②视频内容为反馈截图或反馈视频 ③评论区置顶带🈶神秘代码：@AGiCB66 🈲止刷浏览量刷赞，查到无效😠 ---------------------------------------------- 💯活动②：拦截反馈图领💷 10张反馈=2.88💰 20张反馈=6.88💰 30张反馈=12.88💰 无上限，有多少发多少❗️❗️❗️ 🫡前提条件↓ ①🤝[反馈图要能看见拦截的主页]🫵 ②不能重复提交反馈图 此活动💯有效🌐 😇领取奖励找：https://t.me/agdfsbot 拦截点我获取
👍3🙏1
阿古导航页❗️❗️❗️ 公益拦截点我 免费领💰活动点我 点击神秘链接 低价卡网点我 参加互推点我
❤4
To the Channel's Entire Membership, Administrators, and Telegram Support Team: Dear Members — This space is an exclusive platform dedicated to EU-compliant technical exchanges. We are committed to upholding a pure technical discussion orientation in strict accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Digital Services Act (DSA), and Telegram's platform rules. The following are inviolable bottom line…
❤3👍1💋1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @AGiCB66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,565,131 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阿古通知频道🇨🇳” (@AGiCB66), 1,565 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGiCB66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.