🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 薰衣草 骗子账号: @xunyicao7 被骗金额: 40u 骗子永久ID: 8760630935 被骗过程: 公网v反先单跑路 之前都让他先挂U这次先给他出就跑了这种人一律挂U出单天天换皮跑这点逼钱够干啥的 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@libie · ID:741199874 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租

Channel
「清风」全网骗子曝光频道
@AG_K3B
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35,552subscribers
-1,215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002160168882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AG_K3B |
| Description | Telegram最具名气同时也是全网最大的灰色产业交流群 骗子曝光:@AG_K3B 清风供需:@e1700pd 清风大群:@e1700a 清风二群:@e1700b ▂____________________________ 人工服务:@e1700 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AG_K3B |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 35,552 | -30 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 35,582 | -86 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 35,668 | -307 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 35,975 | -66 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 36,041 | -61 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 36,102 | -92 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 36,194 | -245 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 36,439 | -65 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 36,504 | -48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 36,552 | -215 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 36,767 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 36,767 | first reading |
Engagement
270 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.86%
- avg views ÷ 35,552 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 660
- 270 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.18%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 270
- of 270 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 270 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 270 (6 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 178,250 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,520
- Videos
- ≈4,140
- Links
- ≈3,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 29m 41s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 255 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 71 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 51 | 54.8% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 19.4% | |
| 🖕 | 17 | 18.3% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 270 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 270 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 270 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AG_K3B. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 270 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 伤心 骗子账号: @shangxin9178 被骗金额: 联通 骗子永久ID: 8862001336 被骗过程: 出完联通装死不结账 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@fano3o · ID:7866472754 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 黑色 毛衣 骗子账号: @hsmy7 被骗金额: 8u 骗子永久ID: 7563303554 被骗过程: 车小档 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@HUI_LONG_DAO · ID:7811219844 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 小y 骗子账号: @wqwnb 被骗金额: 0.9u 骗子永久ID: 6500968628 被骗过程: 可乐都跑活不起之人 你要支名我送你都行😂 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@JieAndTian · ID:8970915726 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 财务周洁 骗子账号: @JieziQvQ 被骗金额: 0.5u 骗子永久ID: 8161035240 被骗过程: 出支付宝名字 不结帐 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@J52017 · ID:8452695117 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 全家死干净了的 骗子账号: @pojieweiming 被骗金额: 6U 骗子永久ID: 8480130232 被骗过程: 这种没脑子的大家最好不要找他出单 说话不用带脑子 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@zuqiong · ID:7925859061 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 1 骗子账号: @ASDDD49 被骗金额: 1u 骗子永久ID: 7008325391 被骗过程: p3跑完后就不结账,给人家买棺材本😂😂😂 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@SP888886 · ID:7130059118 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 小夕 骗子账号: @xiaoxiyaa 被骗金额: 可乐 骗子永久ID: 8575712683 被骗过程: 死爹妈了狗儿子草拟麻痹 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@ovoaaaa · ID:7065256153 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 清风供需已开 https://t.me/e1700pd
❤1👍1😁1
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: 运气 骗子账号: @Ivjing 被骗金额: 26rmb 骗子永久ID: @Ivjing 被骗过程: 打号狗打不掉装死不退💰 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:安 · ID:8892627235 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
👍2
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: @Hamigua80 骗子账号: 8840039253 被骗金额: 1u 骗子永久ID: 8840039253 被骗过程: 出大头 出完跑路 md1u都跑 家里死完了 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@xiaobaioi · ID:8184122900 直达私聊(骗子帐号) 🍎 苹果直达 🤖 安卓直达 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
👍1
🔺清风反诈🔺新增骗子一枚🔺 📛原因:未选择清风入驻商家交易 ──────────── 骗子昵称: @liuxur11 骗子账号: @liuxur11 被骗金额: 2u 骗子永久ID: 8351319356 被骗过程: 这个脑残找我报假地 给我跑了2u都跑穷人 活不起了 👉 查看诈骗证据媒体 👈 📮 公示人:@qingjing6666 · ID:8315247898 ──────────── 🔰清风平台入驻商家 👮♀️喜力源头查档@ xiLi_698频道认准@xili 👮鸿创平价查档@ hchjt01频道认准@ hchjtpd01 👮乔治源头查档@ QZqiaozhi01 守信者_路自宽 👮法宝查档公益国税法人 核验数据免费用@ dataheyanbot 👮此广告位出租
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 270 posts we hold for @AG_K3B. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 779,500 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 10
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 10
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AG_K3B named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“「清风」全网骗子曝光频道” (@AG_K3B), 35,552 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AG_K3B.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.