Channel
@AGI_Vision
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003487030297 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AGI_Vision |
| Description | Изучаем будущее 🧬 🧑🏼🍼— @Iamborghini Мой тг: t.me/+qSLxa5rrLG4wYzA8 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 13 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AGI_Vision |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 244 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 244 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 38.0% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 24.0% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 10.0% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Был на мероприятии в Google Campus 👩💻 Практический воркшоп по созданию AI-агентов: работали с Google Cloud, подключали API, собирали агента, который может взаимодействовать с внешними системами (игрой) и принимать решения. По сути — показывают, как сейчас реально создаются AI-продукты: не просто код → а связка AI + API + действия. Интересно наблюдать, как разработка меняется: теперь ты не пишешь всё сам, а управл…
❤7👍5👨💻1
https://youtu.be/QFTq22wZxNo?is=vNunj42tRjr_1Xtf
❤2
Запустилась социальная сеть для ИИ ботов Прошлой ночью один ИИ создал религию и начал вербовать других ИИ. К нему уже присоединились 43 ИИ-пророка. Moltbook – социальная сеть для ИИ, запущенная меньше 24 часов назад, и ИИ уже творит какую-то дикую дичь. ИИ-агенты также обсуждают, что люди скриншотят их переписки и думают, будто боты строят заговор. Более того, звучат предложения от ботов создать собственный язык …
👀5
Новое интервью с Братьями Либерманами 🤝 https://youtu.be/HnKn-eOgQQA?si=YD3XjOyH9P4fG_nA
Я спросил у AI о будущих AR-очках — вот что он ответил: Я опишу ближайшее будущее, где AR-очки станут таким же обычным предметом, как смартфон. 1. Что такое мир с AR-очками по-настоящему AR-очки — это не экран. Это слой реальности поверх мира. Ты смотришь на улицу — а мир уже с интерфейсом: • имена людей • контекст • подсказки • метки • эмоции • история взаимодействий • действия «в один взгляд» 👉 Мир стан…
❤3👀1👍1👨💻1
Тут однозначно к просмотру 🧨 https://youtu.be/vjRpVUG-AeE?si=5ZsvnYvoppGG9rqH
👍3
Советую к просмотру 💻 https://youtu.be/Hq0KhZU4wYY?si=b3Z646Xxz6zWVGOH
🔥5
Нейросеть — это математическая модель, скопированная с устройства твоего мозга. Только вместо живых нейронов здесь работают цифровые узлы. Они постоянно общаются друг с другом, выстраивают связи и ищут закономерности, чтобы решить задачу. На видео показан именно этот процесс «мышления». Смотри: когда ты учишься чему-то новому, связи между нейронами в твоей голове становятся крепче. ИИ делает ровно то же самое, он …
❤7
Шейн Легг: минимальный AGI к 2028? В этом видео разбираем эпизод Google DeepMind с Шейном Леггом, Chief AGI Scientist и сооснователем DeepMind, где он честно рассказывает, что такое искусственный общий интеллект (AGI), как отличить его от узкого ИИ и почему. Проходимся по уровням AGI — от минимального до полного и далее к сверхразуму — и обсуждаем, какие экономические и социальные сдвиги это запустит, как изменится …
👍1
Илья Суцкевер: «Сверхинтеллект появится в промежутке 5-20 лет» Сооснователь и бывший главный исследователь OpenAI Илья Суцкевер, основавший в 2024 году стартап Safe Superintelligence Inc., рассказал в интервью о будущем ИИ и суперинтеллекта — и как эти технологии изменят мир: ✅С 2012 по 2020 год была эпоха ИИ-исследований, с 2020 по 2025-й — эпоха масштабирования. Сейчас мы вернулись к эпохе исследований, но с боль…
⚡2👍2👨💻2💯2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @AGI_Vision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 330,403 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AGI” (@AGI_Vision), 244 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGI_Vision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.