Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for لـزوجـي🤍

Channel

لـزوجـي🤍

@AGAGGM

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,624subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001380995323
TypeChannel
Username@AGAGGM
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AGAGGM

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6243,6743,6492 September 2026 — 3,674 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,672 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,654 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,643 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,630 subscribers25 September 2026 — 3,624 subscribers2 September 202625 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 24 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,617–3,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 18:383,624-6
16 Sept 2026, 19:593,630-13
13 Sept 2026, 01:183,643-11
8 Sept 2026, 16:573,654-18
3 Sept 2026, 02:283,672-2
2 Sept 2026, 06:303,674first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.52%
avg views ÷ 3,624 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.833%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held17 (21 December 2025 – 30 August 2026)
Views total255
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18073.8%
👍2811.5%
😁124.92%
💯83.28%
👏52.05%
💔52.05%
😢31.23%
🥰31.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

وإنْ عتَبْتَ فَلا تَجرَح مَشاعِرهَا يَـا طيَّبَ القَلبِ رِفقًا بِالقواريـرِ

❤1

30 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC135 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

💛اللهم تولّنا فيمن تولّيت💛

9 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC472 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ﻟﻮ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺃهل الجاهلية ﻟﻴﺪفنوا #ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺕ لدَفنوا ﻧﺼﻒ #ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ_ﺑﺎﻟﺨﻄﺄ....! #كن_رجلاً...

👍7😁2

2 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,090 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

سَأُفْرِطُ فِي دَلَال بَناتِي يَومًا.. حَتىٰ يُظَنّ أنَّهُ لَا تُوجَدُ فَتيَاتٍ غَيرَهُنَّ.❤

❤10💔2👍1

5 Jun 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,450 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

‏سيدنا عبدالله بن مسعود لما كان يشوف بنته، كان يحضنها ويقولها: مرحبًا يا سِتر عبدالله من النار 💗

❤16

17 May 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,690 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

لا حَرمَ اللهُ رَجُلًا نِعمةَ الزّوَاجِ، ولا حَرمَ اللهُ امرأةً نعمَة الأُمُومَة.

❤18👏3🥰3

8 May 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,860 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

أسأل الله أن يرزق كل محروم الذرية الصالحة المصلحة🤎

❤24

17 Apr 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,910 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

"يا لهفَ نفسي على شيئينِ لو جُمِعا ‏عندي، لكنتُ إذًا مِن أسعدِ البشرِ!"💔

❤11💔3😢3

12 Apr 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,830 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

اللهم زوجي يسر له علاجه يسر له هذا المسير يسر له يارب يارب ليحقق أفضل النتائج رب لا تردنا ليس لنا إلا أنت أنت رب الأطباء ورب العالمين

❤14

20 Mar 2026, 22:51 UTC≈2,200 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

هل الزواج جميل؟ ج/ الزواج زي الدنيا بالضبط .. زينة ومتاع لا يخلو من كدر .. ولا يجمل ويستمر إلا بطاعة الله فيه ! اللي يفهم كده = هيرتاح .. ويعيش أوقات الجمال بالشكر، وأوقات العواصف -التي لا بد منها- بالصبر. الزواج عكاز يتوكأ عليه اثنان .. تآلفا على نقص، ورضيا بالمتاح .. يقطعان الطريق سويا إلى الكمال .. في الجنة.

❤15

26 Feb 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,500 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

°•💍 إثنَان لا يَجتَمعَان: الكذِب مَع الرّجولة .. وقِلّة اﻷدَب معَ اﻷنُوثة. 🤎

❤13💯4👍3

20 Feb 2026, 17:07 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

" لَا يَفْطِرُ! " 🍼😂👶🏻

😁10❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AGAGGM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

❤️💌 رسائل زوجية 💌❤️
@lovemessage7 · 35,653
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
رقـــ🦋ــ‌‏هہ
@reeikhh · 23,877
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لـزوجـي🤍” (@AGAGGM), 3,624 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGAGGM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.