Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Is This an ADHD Thing?

Channel

Is This an ADHD Thing?

@ADHDthing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,829subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692088106
TypeChannel
Username@ADHDthing
Created9 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ADHDthing

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,7758,8998,8376 August 2026 — 8,837 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,869 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,879 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,890 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,899 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,784 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,775 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,783 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,794 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,805 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,816 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,822 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,829 subscribers8,8296 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,756–8,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:368,829+7
14 Sept 2026, 11:168,822+6
10 Sept 2026, 23:358,816+11
6 Sept 2026, 09:158,805+11
1 Sept 2026, 17:438,794+11
29 Aug 2026, 10:278,783+8
26 Aug 2026, 01:438,775-9
22 Aug 2026, 18:578,784-115
19 Aug 2026, 12:358,899+9
16 Aug 2026, 14:088,890+11
12 Aug 2026, 16:048,879+10
9 Aug 2026, 11:318,869+31
6 Aug 2026, 11:218,838+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:368,837first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 53 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,468 reactions across 49 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,03231.4%
😭1,72726.7%
❤1,18018.2%
🤝5057.81%
😁3204.95%
🔥2213.42%
🤣1251.93%
😢1081.67%
👏651.00%
🥰430.665%
🙈200.309%
❤‍🔥160.247%
🤔150.232%
🍓100.155%
😱100.155%
💊90.139%
🥴90.139%
😐80.124%
🤯80.124%
👌70.108%
13 further kinds300.464%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,978 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,420 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Lego city building game???? Two of my special interests combined? Bring them in!

❤42

26 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,580 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

AOAOAOAAOAOAOAOAO https://store.steampowered.com/app/1573550/LEGO_Skylines/

❤26🤯8🥴2👀1🤩1

25 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC≈1,360 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @midgetmemesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤39💯31🥴5😱3

25 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,550 views110 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @fennesmemesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😢49💯33❤9😭9👌6🔥3💔1

25 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,580 views88 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @adhdragonPhoto

#adhdcore goodnight

❤44💯30😭13🤝1

25 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,620 views103 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @adultieradultPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯52😭44🤝3❤2👾1💘1

23 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,880 views106 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ndkSyndicatePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯49❤31😭15🤝4🥰4😁3

23 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈3,110 views166 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯120❤27😁10🤝7👌1🥰1

23 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,900 views147 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @joyofexistencePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😭99🤝37😁8❤1🔥1🥰1

23 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈2,230 views117 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭63😁39❤11😎4

20 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,120 views155 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @midgetmemesPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯99😭35❤19❤‍🔥1🤝1

20 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,010 views161 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @adultieradultPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💯83❤38😭38🥰1😐1

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @ADHDthing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Shower Thoughts 🚿
@showerthoughts · 36,128
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
i don't know how to be funny anymore
@everyone · 77,973
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 September 2026
Shitpost
@shitpost · 25,594
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 September 2026
Hacker News
@hackernewslive · 28,368
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Is This an ADHD Thing?” (@ADHDthing), 8,829 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ADHDthing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.