Channel
@ACT_PODCAST
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,300subscribers
+125 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001951681950 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ACT_PODCAST |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ACT_PODCAST |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 1,300 | +125 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 1,175 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 1,175 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,319 |
| Reactions total | 235 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
235 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 37.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 16.6% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 12.3% | |
| ⚡ | 26 | 11.1% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 5.11% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.70% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.426% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توی این نانوپادکست ۲–۳ دقیقهای، میریم سراغ یه فکت علمی درباره کمالگرایی و سه تا مثال خیلی واقعی از اینکه چطور «سختگیری افراطی» تو رو از حرکت میاندازه. اگر همیشه میخوای همهچیز عالی باشه و همین «آلیطلبی» باعث شده هیچوقت شروع نکنی، این ویس میتونه اولین لگد به دیوارِ کمالگراییت باشه. بیا یاد بگیریم «کثیف انجام دادن کارها» چطور میتونه ازت یک آدم عملگرا بسازه. 🎧 @ACT_PODCAST
❤5🎄1
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
«اگه بهت بگم کمالگرایی بیشتر از تنبلی، رویاهای تو رو کشته، باهام بحث میکنی یا حاضر میشی یکبار “کثیف” شروع کنی؟» #nanoPOD ⏳ @ACT_PODCAST
👍3
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
«سختی کشیدن وقتی معنا داره که خودت انتخابش کرده باشی؛ رنجِ انتخابشده، وقار میسازه، رنجِ تحمیلشده، قربانی میسازه.» @ACT_PODCAST #حق اگه این حرف یه چیزی تو مغزت جابهجا کرد، یه 🔥 یا هر ریاکشنی که حسات رو میگه بزن، ببینیم چند نفر حاضرن سختیِ انتخابشده رو بغل کنن.
🔥21👍5
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
«وقتی برای همهچیز خودتو قربانی میکنی، در نهایت هیچکس تو رو جدی نمیگیره؛ فداکاری بدون وقار، میشه حراجِ شخصیت.» @ACT_PODCAST #حق اگه این حرف یه گوشه از روابطت رو زیر سوال برد، یه 💔 یا هر ریاکشنی بزن، ببینیم چند نفر میخوان فداکاریشون رو از حراجبودن جدا کنن.
💔12❤🔥6
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
متا اسکریپت ۲ | ذهن دوپاره یه بخش از وجودت میدونه باید چی کار کنی؛ یه بخش دیگه درست در لحظه حساس، مسیر رو عوض میکنه. میخوای پیشرفت کنی، اما به چیزی پناه میبری که فقط موقتاً حالت رو بهتر میکنه. این جنگ بین «چیزی که میدونی» و «کاری که میکنی» اتفاقی نیست. #متااسکریپت 🎧 @ACT_PODCAST
🤯4🔥1
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
🧠 نکتهٔ کوچیک ولی مؤثر: الگوریتمهای تلگرام رو تعامل شما میچرخونه، نه فقط تعداد اعضا! پس اگه این پادکست بهتون چیزی داد 🎧 یه ❤️ بزنید، یه کامنت بنویسید، برای یه دوست فوروارد کنید. سه حرکت کوچیک، دیدهشدن بزرگ ✨ @ACT_PODCAST
❤🔥18❤7
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
«وقار یعنی حاضر باشی برای ارزشت درد بکشی؛ آدمِ بیدرد، معمولاً آدمِ بیارزشِ درونی هم هست.» @ACT_PODCAST #حق اگه این حرف دلت رو بین «راحتی» و «شرافت» دودل کرد، یه ⚡️ یا هر ریاکشن دیگهای بزن، ببینیم چند نفر حاضرن دردِ شرافتمندانه رو انتخاب کنن.
⚡26❤🔥3❤1👍1
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
دو نفر رو تصور کن؛ هردو استرس دارن، هردو درد دارن. یکی، هر فشار عصبی، سیگار روشن میکنه.🚬 یکی دیگه، هر فشار عصبی، کفش میپوشه میره بدوه.🏃♂️ هر دو درد رو میکشن؛ فرقشون تو مسکنیه که انتخاب میکنن. آخرش، یکی ریه خسته، بدن داغون، اعتماد به نفسِ رفتاری پایین؛ یکی بدن قوی، مغزِ شرطیشده به حرکت، احترام به خودش بالا. تو نمیتونی بدون درد زندگی کنی؛ اما میتونی انتخاب کنی: سیگار یا دویدن؟ پ*رن یا قدمزدن؟ فرار یا عمل؟ هر…
❤22👍3
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
سلام رفقا ⛳️ یه هفته مجازی نیستم برای دیتاکس و تمرکز رو کارام و استراحت و... . کسایی هم که باهام مشاوره دارن یا ... میتونن از راه ارتباطی که براشون گذاشتم باهام ارتباط بگیرن. -پستا هم براتون طبق برنامه زمانی قرار میگیرن. امیدوارم در حال حرکت باشی....🌟🔥 -امیرحسین
👍8❤1
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
⛳️چطوری وقتی سقوط میکنی دوباره سرپا شی؟🤨 با تجربه خود جوردن پیترسون #jordan_peterson #shortvid 🎧 @ACT_PODCAST
❤5
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
🔸وسواسی بودن و کمالگرا بودن در مورد حافظمون و عملکردش چه بلایی میتونه سرمون بیاره؟ 🔹کمالگرایی در مورد قدرت حافظمون چطوری میتونه در بلند مدت یادگیریمون رو به فاک بده؟ 🔸چطوری کمالگراییمون تو یادگیری رو کاهش بدیم؟ 🔹چرا موقع مطالعه یا یادگیری استرس ، اضطراب میگیرم؟ 🔶چرا وقتی یچیزی یاد میره به خودم شک میکنم و اضطراب میگیرم؟ و سوال های دیگر....❓❔ #محتوای_اختصاصی #مقاله 🎧 @ACT_PODCAST
❤3
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
📍رابطه کمالگرایی در مورد حافظه و ناتوانی در بازیابی اطلاعات♻️ 📄منبع|سورس 🎧 @ACT_PODCAST
❤🔥3
Signed ᴬᵐⁱʳ ᴴᵒˢᵉⁱⁿ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ACT_PODCAST. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 353,849 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اکت پادکست | رنج دانایی، اوج توانایی” (@ACT_PODCAST), 1,300 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ACT_PODCAST.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.