庆祝频道人数4k 给大家发一个红包
❤1👍1

Channel
@ACEMODCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,027subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002553643913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ACEMODCN |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ACEMODCN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 4,027 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 4,035 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 4,039 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 4,039 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (2 December 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,899 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
庆祝频道人数4k 给大家发一个红包
❤1👍1
🧧🎉红包发送成功🎉🧧 🔥达利DaLi发送了一个拼手气红包! 💵总金额: 3888 U🪙 🚦剩余: 68/188 🥇 45.68 USDT🪙 - 天天 🥈 34.76 USDT🪙 - 大田 🥉 30.01 USDT🪙 - 王梓慈善家
❤1👍1
✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 🥰点击下方按钮加入即可搜索🥰
庆祝频道人数4k 给大家发一个红包
🎉🧧红包发送成功🧧🎉 ✔️达利DaLi发送了 一个红包! 💵总金额: 3888 U💰 📊 剩余: 168/388 🥇 88.88 USDT - 染染 🥈 78.26 USDT - 公益落叶 🥉 68.61 USDT - 鲨鱼战神
🔤🔤🔤🔤黑盒已公益 全网独一家 ⬇️手机号定位 ⬇️支付宝码反 ❄️补齐身份证/手机号 ❄️个人大头 🛡手机号反姓名 🛡v反/Q反三件套 🖥刑侦全户 🖥短信轰炸 📱无违规永久思路 🛰️无违规概率永久思路 新增几个功能:ai脱换衣,破解梯子大全,酒店摄像直播,照片人脸扫描,精准模糊猎魔... 点我进入频道获取卡密 点我进入频道获取卡密
庆祝频道人数4k 给大家发一个红包
❤1
🎉🧧红包发送成功🧧🎉 ✔️达利客服-娜娜 发送了一个红包 💵总金额: 5888 U💰 📊 剩余: 188/398 🥇 76.88 USDT - nbns 🥈 56.10 USDT - 不凡 🥉 55.95 USDT - 辣椒免费公益
❤1
✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 🥰点击下方按钮加入即可搜索🥰
现在购买凭订单截图找客服领18.88红包
👍1
免费的开户工具! ⭐Doro免费开盒助手 ✅开戶专用✅ ✅户籍猎手✅ 安装包下载链接 https://wwr.lanzoui.com/b01bjl2qob 提取码 : 0000 售后客服 @QXZYNB 官方频道 @ACEMODCN
❤2
Signed 冰雪
📌主题:关于频道内容的澄清 - 不宣传或支持非法商品 - 武器 亲爱的 Telegram 团队, 我的频道不支持、宣传或参与任何非法活动,包括出售现实世界的枪支或违禁商品。 任何提及“枪支”、“枪械实验室”或类似词语的严格指代 Battlegrounds Mobile India(PUBG 和 BGMI)的游戏内物品,与现实生活中的武器或非法交易无关。 我完全尊重 Telegram 的政策,并确保我的频道只专注于游戏相关讨论和虚拟游戏内交易。 感谢您的时间和支持
Signed 雄安
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ACEMODCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 112,615 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doro户籍猎手” (@ACEMODCN), 4,027 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ACEMODCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.