Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 白子租号铺『高质量首选💯』

Channel

白子租号铺『高质量首选💯』

@ACECheatZG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,754subscribers

-155 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002217790814
TypeChannel
Username@ACECheatZG
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 13 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ACECheatZG

Growth

12,75413,04412,8997 August 2026 — 12,909 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,883 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,867 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,839 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,815 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,781 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,762 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,963 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,018 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,044 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,038 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,987 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,936 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,905 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,868 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,841 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,824 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,787 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,754 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,711–13,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 02:1112,754-33
29 Aug 2026, 01:0412,787-37
28 Aug 2026, 02:0312,824-17
27 Aug 2026, 01:1712,841-27
26 Aug 2026, 02:3212,868-37
25 Aug 2026, 05:0212,905-31
24 Aug 2026, 02:3912,936-51
22 Aug 2026, 12:0612,987-51
21 Aug 2026, 00:0413,038-6
19 Aug 2026, 20:3613,044+26
18 Aug 2026, 20:3313,018+55
17 Aug 2026, 20:3812,963+58
16 Aug 2026, 22:2412,905+63
15 Aug 2026, 14:5512,842+80
14 Aug 2026, 01:1412,762-19
12 Aug 2026, 17:0412,781-34
11 Aug 2026, 13:3512,815-24
10 Aug 2026, 13:1212,839-28
9 Aug 2026, 16:0412,867-16
8 Aug 2026, 17:3612,883first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 13 August 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.38%
avg views ÷ 12,754 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.998%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held107 (13 August 202430 August 2026)
Views total28,867
Reactions total227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 23s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

642 reactions across 83 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43267.3%
7010.9%
🖕355.45%
👏203.12%
😁203.12%
👎192.96%
🤣192.96%
🥰91.40%
🔥81.25%
🍓30.467%
🤔30.467%
🤮20.312%
😭10.156%
🤡10.156%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2024 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 100 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ACECheatZG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2024 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC37 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

PRO授权地址主接口出问题了,先用备用接口🙏

👍3

29 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC98 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZCBZ686Photo

⚠️PRO经典授权号/皮肤好已补货依旧人工验号99%都是没有问题的⚠️ 由于拿货价格上涨所以小幅度涨价,后面拿货价格降了,商品价格也会降下来

👍5

28 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC151 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

现在和平检测导致的授权号质量不太行希望大家理解有问题都补-掉授权大部分24小时都会恢复『自带的给你们正常补』 各位介意的话先买直登号/扫码号吧

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC243 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

PRO授权如果你们先开始能授权后面授权不上的显示服务器繁忙的,大部分24小时后即可恢复『自带的正常补』 GZ授权号如果先开始能授权,后面授权出来的是一半数据,大部分等24小时之后即可恢复『自带的正常补』 介意的话买直登号和扫码号就行了🥳

👍2

26 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC268 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

⚠️PRO授权号已补货依旧人工验号99%都是没有问题的⚠️

👍2

26 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC303 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026

12点以后购买的,带上你们的账号信息发给我,我后台给你们删一下,不小心把数据库恢复到12点了,不删的话别人买走会被顶号的

👍4

26 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC291 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ZCBZ686Photo

上架和平经典高等级直登号『全网最低价』 ⚠️30级以上的有号主顶号是没有售后的⚠️

👍5

25 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC332 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

AY授权号剩下这点免费送了,先到先得🙂‍↕️

👍71

23 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC440 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026

⚠️低等级直登号已经降价了,直接不赚钱了就挣个辛苦费⚠️

👍4

22 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC533 views4 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

⚠️PRO授权号已补货依旧人工验号99%都是没有问题的⚠️

👍4

22 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC557 viewsread 30 August 2026
Photo

新增了下发op备用接口,在主接口繁忙或按需使用 找不到入口的按键选项的:手机删除浏览器缓存 电脑ctrl+f5刷新缓存! 主接口为长效op(不改米不被提不会健全) 备用接口是短效OP(有效期7天内) 并且极易触发异地。 工作室请选择主接口。 玩家选择备用接口(均无冻结)

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @ACECheatZG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ACECheatZG edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

大家都玩什么游戏?

  1. 和平精英🎮16%
  2. PUBG🎮64%
  3. 三角洲行动🎮20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

你们有root吗

  1. 没有81%
  2. 28%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2024 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 391,287 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“白子租号铺『高质量首选💯』” (@ACECheatZG), 12,754 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ACECheatZG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.