甜甜 @tiantiandengn #超出预期 颜值本人很不错,脸很小,眼睛也比较灵动,和照片基本一致。 168 A+ 暖白,腿巨长,真筷子腿,柔韧度很好,说话软软的确实是女大的感觉。 体验给到一个夯,有点瘦,建议多吃点。

Channel
ABC的L
@ABCL123456789
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,339subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002192201148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ABCL123456789 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ABCL123456789 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 2,339 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 2,353 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 2,354 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 2,352 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:24 | 2,353 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 2,348 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 2,353 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 2,349 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 2,359 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 2,358 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 2,357 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 2,356 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 2,356 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
潘潘 大圈5 #超出预期 颜值相当可以,脸很小,立体度很高。174 C饱满,身段非常好,高白纯御集合了。最近貌似还挺火,可能也是因为刚开不久体验很赞,口活一绝,很值得去。
Yoki 大圈 5 #超出预期 上个月去的妹妹,长相底子还不错,不过最近可能有点过敏,脸泛红,远看好点。对比视频,本人更偏御姐,不是嫩妹类型。 163左右,黄皮,身材丰满 大D胸大屁股没肚子,不坦。没捏出来是有底座还是腺体胸,挺软的。 做的体验很爽,投入度非常高,很润,即主动也可以被很好引导,尤其声音也挺夹的,弄一身汗。
晴淑淑 @qingshushu2008 #超出预期 #杭州 清纯,灵动,眼睛很漂亮,小鹿眼睛,素颜抗打,眉眼之间颇有故人的感觉。频道照片完全反向美颜。照片是本人,但完全不是一个风格。(她自己也知道眼睛好看。 大概1米66,穿JK短裙很好看,白皮且光滑,胸a+。是高中校园小女友的感觉,白月光既视感,声音非常好听,甜甜的。 年纪比较小,估计就 18,小菜鸡水平,假以时日会慢慢成长吧。
林瑾瑶 @linjinyao1 #超出预期 今天穿搭非常的女大,人的气质也比较像,比较腼腆。 颜值相当不错,脸比较小,笑起来很好看,没有什么整感,脸的立体度很高。 166,身材很棒,胸有 C,底座不明显。皮肤顺滑,黄皮。 反馈非常自然,也非常的好,我很吃这套。可以安心地当一个禽兽。
林美娜 @AAshasha5 #超出预期 颜值不错,尤其眼睛很漂亮。不过最近有点爆痘。一米六六,身材非常顶,腰臀比爆表,皮肤很光滑。 整体体验可以说是酣畅淋漓了。
林一 @futianlinqiao1 #超出预期 这个妹妹感觉可0可1 整场呼吸有点困难,玩得很尽兴
杰西卡 @Bsc_Jesse #超出预期 和照片相比,实际上本人还挺可爱的,脸很小并且立体度很好。有点小女孩为了成熟化的妆的感觉,没有那么混血,也没有那么御。 小麦色皮肤,很光滑。 年前去的时间有点久了,就记得在镜子面前蹲下来,现在想想有点血脉膨胀。
林迟 @zioaqp 颜值相当不错,个也挺高,估计有一米六八,腿很长,皮肤很白,胸有 B 加,口活意外不错。 人倒是比较逗,可以聊天玩一玩。 但是呢,有点爱躲,怕痒。
绾绾 @wanwanaini 18p 讨论度比较高的新妹妹,第一天开去了。 黄皮,166 胸B水滴真胸手感软可随意捏。 肚子往胸上有疤,纹身较小肩有,胸前有一行字,但人不精神。 脸不大,比视频还是有距离,看视频和之前喜欢一个妹妹差不多固冲。 确实是新人,都比较生疏,不过新人有新人的体验。性格蛮好,也比较客气,服务真的很不错了。 口非常舒服,很卖力,且相当有技巧。sw给的挺多,可以逗妹妹。柔韧性好,腿可大大大M,也很敏感。 推荐机位,传教士大M下巴没有赘肉比较好看,后入侧头闭眼脸流畅感可以。做的倒是酣畅淋漓。 推荐主动引导的兄弟。
暖暖 @xgg5200 #成都 #超出预期 172,模特身材,B真胸,身段非常顶了。皮肤暖白色滑,手感好,也很敏感,不过大花臂➕腿。 图片颜值完全赶不上本人,本人颜值是比较协调好看的,且基本没硬伤。 聊天很有意思,后悔曾经精神过。可以事前事后来一根,无脑放空型。
馒头 大圈5 驾照,是这个风格,没这么纯。瘦10斤估计差不多。 感觉在22岁,不像新开妹子,工作室环境还可以。 大概163 93斤,真C很舒服,皮肤暖白没有纹身,软和滑手感好。腰有肉,但腿非常细,屁股又大。 妈生脸,有一点婴儿肥。 妹子说最近胖了,以前瘦的时候应该脸还会好看一些。俯看妹妹能手动瘦脸。不推荐传教士看脸。 非常好摆弄的炮架子,腿柔韧性很好,胸大屁股浑圆,sw有但不多,水挺多,做起来倒是非常爽。
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ABCL123456789. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ABCL123456789 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ABC的L” (@ABCL123456789), 2,339 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ABCL123456789.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.