Channel
@zzzpng0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,047subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002194250935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzzpng0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzzpng0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 2,047 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 2,059 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 2,064 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 2,069 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 2,071 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,064 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 2,069 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 2,071 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 2,072 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
860 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 348 | 40.5% | |
| 💋 | 218 | 25.3% | |
| 💘 | 141 | 16.4% | |
| 😘 | 48 | 5.58% | |
| 🙉 | 42 | 4.88% | |
| 🦄 | 40 | 4.65% | |
| 🙊 | 16 | 1.86% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 0.581% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.233% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 860 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 21 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zzzpng0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 September 2025 to 21 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
время пролетело так быстро, йомайо... 🖤 хочу поблагодарить всех кто следил за нами и поддерживал нас, так же хочу сказать спасибо Владпанской и админ составу за совместную работу! с Рождеством и Новым Годом всех, надеюсь мы ещё увидимся! 🌟🌟 — Юджин 🖤
🍓43💋17🦄8💘6🙊2
всё хорошее рано или поздно заканчивается. К сожалению и нашей работе пришёл конец. Что было очень приятно, не всегда можно найти такие хорошие каналы в которых хочется оставаться и по сей день. Всем спасибо. Ваша Лишу
💋23🍓10💘5🙉3🙊2💊1🦄1😘1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Здравствуйте, с вами владелица🌹🌹. Вы уже заметили, что канал не такой активный, как раньше, поэтому я принимаю решение кинуть его в архив. Все пнг, которые тут были останутся, можете их использывать (но прошу отмечать)‼️. Я, к сожалению, выгорела к вырезанию пнг. ❤️ Если кто-то хочет следить за мной и дальше мой новый канал - @proxyvladpanskaya , он по тематике зенлесса, но не по пнг. Очень сильно извиняюсь…
💋26🙊9🙉7👾3💘3🍓1💊1🦄1
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Lishee ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #оффарт #йидхари взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 30 реакций— новый пнг!!
🍓26💘9💋8😘2
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ СТАЖЁРвичис ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #оффарт #сид взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 25 реакций— новый пнг!!
🍓22💘14🦄9😘4
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ СТРАЖЁРвичис ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #оффарт #юзуха взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 25 реакций— новый пнг!!
💋17🍓13💘8😘2
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ СТАЖЁРВичис ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт - ??? #корин взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 35 реакций— новый пнг!!
💋15🍓7💘6🙉6👾1
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Sandwhy ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт #джейн Cr: enargeia5525 on X взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 25 рк - новый пнг!
🍓22💋11💘9😘3🦄1
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Sandwhy ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт #Вивиан Cr: uci_meii on X взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 25 рк - новый пнг!
💘23🍓14💋8😘2🦄1
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Sandwhy ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт #харумаса Cr: narumiyafuri on X взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 25 рк - новый пнг!
🍓23🙉17💋13🦄5💘1
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Sandwhy ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт #харумаса Cr: Yuchizero on X взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 20 рк - новый пнг!
🍓28💋9💘8😘2
ℕ℮Ꮤ ⅌ℕᏩ. ᠻꪚ᥆ꪑ Sandwhy ςⲏɑⲛ૯ʟʟ - @zzzpng0 Файл в комментариях! #фанарт #гашетка или #триггер Cr: Magikflaan on X взяли? + в комментарии / реакция 15 рк - новый пнг!
🍓25🙉5💘4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zzzpng0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АРХИВ ♡ ZZZ png ♡” (@zzzpng0), 2,047 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzzpng0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.