30 Sept 2026, 10:10 UTC8 viewsread 30 September 2026
https://t.me/zhengzhouwaiwei02
Channel
郑州商K
@zzktv2026
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,066subscribers
+52 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004372913687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzktv2026 |
| Created | 29 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzktv2026 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:54 | 1,066 | +52 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 1,014 | no change |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:47 | 1,014 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 29 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.34%
- avg views ÷ 1,066 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (29 September 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 57 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 43s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
30 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC9 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video
🧜♂️ 您好！ 点击置顶可查看群内各项规则和福利. 🔺 发现骗子请第一时间 发群里或者私聊管理 曝光她！ 🔺 加入本群,请遵守以下规则! 🔺 个人兼职进群发广告 🔺 请把 群链接 分享至个人频道 🔺 不遵守发现禁言处理 感谢配合. 🔺 (解除禁言联系管理) 🔺 群链接:https://t.me/zhengzhoujlq
30 Sept 2026, 09:51 UTC10 viewsread 30 September 2026
https://t.me/zhengzhoujlq
29 Sept 2026, 10:13 UTC30 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video
郑州来玩商K的六种情况 • 一进来就摸摸亲亲，结束了就问能不能宵夜，我认为这才是玩摸摸唱的最正常的思维，能就能，不能也不亏。 • 进场后腼腆不敢过分，结束心里不舒服觉得贵，问能不能宵夜，不能宵夜就更不舒服，简直两三天都缓不过来，这种基本是纯小白。 • 上来就跟妹妹交底收入普通，述说对妹妹多么多么喜欢幻想白嫖甚至长期，KTV妹妹很现实，无论你说多少，她们也只是在这里上班。 • 上来就能嗨，带动气氛，一路上喝酒游戏不停，这种基本就是玩了很多次，属于老司机，且遇且珍惜。 • 上来就彰显实力，给妹妹小费或者礼物啥的，这种不用说，大多能达到目的。 • 进了包厢一言不发，自己喝自己的酒，也不搭理妹妹，也不唱歌，维持自己的高冷来奢求妹妹的倾心，这种一般是冤种或者小白。 郑州商K找小白、你的各种想法需求都可以实现！ 飞机联系 @xzpfzdq 无法私信，联系 @xzpfzdqbot 私信没回，👇请直接致电。 电话☎️ 15638…
29 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @zzktv2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“郑州商K” (@zzktv2026), 1,066 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzktv2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.