#丝袜 #足交 丝袜裸足一起上
❤70👍26😱1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨

Channel
@zujiaobus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,772subscribers
+846 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001921588749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zujiaobus |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 4 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zujiaobus |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 9,772 | +123 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 9,649 | +119 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 9,530 | +74 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 9,456 | +53 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 9,403 | +79 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 9,324 | +44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 9,280 | +55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 9,225 | +29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 9,196 | +40 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 9,156 | +46 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 9,110 | +47 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 9,063 | +37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 9,026 | +58 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 8,968 | +33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 8,935 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 8,926 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 8,926 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 4 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
555 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 280 | 50.5% | |
| 👍 | 245 | 44.1% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 1.62% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.901% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 555 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2023 to 6 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#丝袜 #足交 丝袜裸足一起上
❤70👍26😱1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#技师 #足交 熟女技师的足交技术真不错
👍31❤26😁4🙏1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#足交 修长白嫩的美脚,简直美的过分了,骨感的脚趾紧扣着鸡巴,让人血脉喷张
👍33❤26🥰3
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#足交 撕破丝袜,在黑丝洞里足交,这种感觉倍儿爽
👍15❤8
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#足交 #舔脚 约酒店里舔脚,diy摩擦脚底
❤15👍9👏2
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#足控 中午吃个玉足汉堡
❤33👍8
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#小芙梨 #足交 完美的足交角度,超清画质加特写,大家学一下,下次找技师就这样拍😂
👍20❤18👏2🥰1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#舔脚 这白嫩玉足放你面前,谁忍得住不吃?
👍35❤18😁2👏1🔥1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
骚话连篇的熟女,她是真爱吃鸡巴,不停称赞这鸡巴真大!一些不属于足控类的精彩作品,会发在在综合色情站 @csdsou 作为存档
👍16❤7
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#舔脚 #sasa的每一天 舔自己的美脚丫,这修长脚趾,我都不敢想有多好吃!
👍25❤16
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#熟女 #足交 #口交 戴眼镜的风骚母狗赵晓利,用她性感的大脚足交
👍18❤9🤮9👎1
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
#桥本香菜 #糖心Vlog #足交 坏学生偷拍被发现,遭到老师足交惩罚
❤17👍4🥰2
Signed TG搜片哥 ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zujiaobus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“足交纯享群|舔脚 裸足 足控 恋足 丝足 美脚 玉足 脚底 易直播 榨精” (@zujiaobus), 9,772 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zujiaobus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.