Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Zloy_psyholog

Channel

Zloy_psyholog

@zloy_psyholog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,923subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001340311514
TypeChannel
Username@zloy_psyholog
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/zloy_psyholog

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9231,9521,937.57 August 2026 — 1,951 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,951 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,952 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,947 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,945 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,943 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,942 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,939 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,936 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,934 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,928 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,925 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,923 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 66 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,919–1,956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 19:391,923-2
6 Oct 2026, 03:351,925-3
28 Sept 2026, 13:401,928-6
16 Sept 2026, 03:361,934-2
12 Sept 2026, 14:161,936-3
8 Sept 2026, 08:401,939-3
3 Sept 2026, 07:081,942-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:071,943-2
20 Aug 2026, 23:131,945-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:171,947-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:241,949-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:181,952+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:321,951no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:251,951first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

525 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20739.4%
🤣8616.4%
🔥8416.0%
💯7915.0%
👍224.19%
😁214.00%
❤‍🔥122.29%
🙏81.52%
🆒20.381%
👌20.381%
😱10.19%
🤩10.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC321 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вспомнилось. Важный пункт в психотерапевтическом контракте: Как-то со своим терапевтом, после 2-й или третьей сессии мы обсуждали условия отмены встречи. Насколько заранее нужно предупреждать друг друга и т.п. И терапевт сказал очень просто, но емко: Если заранее, то все ок. Если день в день отмена и это форс-мажор, то все ок. Если день в день и это не форс-мажор, а просто "проебал", то проебавшая сторона оплачивает…

❤11👍8🔥5💯1

28 Jun 2026, 11:44 UTC576 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пу-пу-пу!) Прислали. Всё так

🤣23💯5😱1

23 Jun 2026, 23:57 UTC767 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Первую половину жизни учишься высказывать свое мнение, вторую - учишься, что высказывать свое мнение не обязательно

💯31❤13😁11👌2

7 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC987 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На подумать: Знаете ли вы, что люди, которые всю жизнь старались свою жизнь не про...вать, тянулись к социальным вершинам и достижениям, перед смертью понимают, что жизнь они бездарно про..али. А люди, которые всю свою жизнь с удовольствием эту самую жизнь про..ывали, перед смертью улыбаются. Наверное)

❤24🤣12👍4😁2💯1

5 Jun 2026, 11:21 UTC941 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На подумать: Разница между любовью с условием и любовью без условий всего в одном слове. Это слово - "даже". Почувствуйте разницу: - Я буду любить тебя, если ты... - Я буду любить тебя, ДАЖЕ если ты... Всего одно слово

❤31👍4❤‍🔥3

25 May 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,080 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня осваивал vpn и прокси, чтобы включить тг и инсту. Сука... В общем, моё уважение всем, кто тут. Вы реально умные и целеустремленные

🤣51😁8🙏8

18 May 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,220 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На подумать: Иногда человек сильнее эмоционально привязан к тому, кого ненавидит, чем к тому, кого любит. Любовь умеет отпускать. А ненависть - хрен то там

🔥16💯12❤10

18 May 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,050 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ни чо так рубрика, на мой взгляд, вышла. Да?

💯29

17 May 2026, 21:54 UTC≈1,010 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Заключение антисуицидального контракта

  1. ХО46%
  2. ХУ56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤2

17 May 2026, 21:54 UTC857 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ХО или ХУ. Часть 3. Голосуем, как повелось, категорично. И анонимно. ХО - хорошо и правильно. ХУ - полная ХУ..

❤6

16 May 2026, 09:57 UTC759 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рубрика ХО или ХУ. Вторая часть - ХУ. Тема: Антисуицидальные контракты. Почему это полная ХУ. Я не буду даже писать о том, что человек, который находится в "точке решения" жить или не жить, легко положит болт на этот контракт, если захочет. Я расскажу о более серьезном аспекте темы. Это может быть сложным для понимания, это может казаться спорным. Однако. Нельзя (!), работая с суицидентом, заключать жёсткое соглашени…

❤34

16 May 2026, 09:52 UTC471 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Долго же я подбирался к написанию 2й части ХО или ХУ. Совсем в запаре был. Но сегодня выехал в длинную командировку, где будет, минимум, 5 перелётов. А в самолётах я продуктивен. Надо же чем-то заниматься, когда летишь 5-6 часов. В общем, будем видеться чаще)

❤12

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zloy_psyholog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 May 2026, 21:54 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

Заключение антисуицидального контракта

  1. ХО46%
  2. ХУ56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Zloy_psyholog” (@zloy_psyholog), 1,923 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zloy_psyholog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.