Channel
@yzjfw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,724subscribers
-3,170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002199662432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yzjfw |
| Created | 2 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yzjfw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 5,724 | -405 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 6,129 | -400 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 6,529 | -404 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 6,933 | -392 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 7,325 | -414 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 7,739 | -299 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 8,038 | -598 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 8,636 | -258 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 8,894 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 8,894 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
506 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 26.3% | |
| 🎉 | 73 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 12.6% | |
| 🤩 | 59 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 51 | 10.1% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.593% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2024 to 20 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
宝贝们欢迎来到 😆😊😭 总导航 🎯 下方为目前开通地区，其他区域陆续开放中~（有些开放小镇未放如导航，可以直接在线咨询客服哦） 泰国地区： 曼谷 芭提雅 清迈 普吉岛 日本地区： 东京 大板 马来西亚：吉隆坡 槟城 柬埔寨国：金边 西港 木牌 波贝 其他国家：新加坡 韩国首尔 香港/澳门 服务分类：➗女开运 长期包养 ➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️ 📱 客服mila 📱 客服仔仔
❤14🔥7👍3
宝贝们欢迎来到 😆😊😭 导航 🌈 地区/总导航 👍 评价/记录 🚩 服务介绍 🚩 交易流程 🚩 常见问题 🚩 服务价格 🈲 午夜福利 🚩 改中文版 ———-—— 联系客服———-—— 💋咪啦mila 🙄仔仔Zzai 🚫 消息双向：@mila1688_bot
🎉22🔥18❤16👍13🤩13🥰11👏8
😛😝😒😕😔😀😋 ⛔️注明：该标记价格为市场均价，针对一些妹妹价格会有高有低，具体以具体客服报价为准） ⌛【柬埔寨🇰🇭】单位：USD 🚩 中国妹妹 喝酒：600 陪嗨：800 快餐：1400 过夜：2000 包天：2500 （不嗨可少喝酒） 嗨夜：2500 酒夜：2400 🚩 越南妹妹 喝酒：250 陪嗨：300 快餐：350 过夜：500 包天：800 （不嗨可少喝酒） 嗨夜：800 酒夜：750 ⌛【泰国🇹🇭】单位：泰铢 🚩 中国妹妹 喝酒：20000 陪嗨：25000 快餐：40000 过夜：65000 包天：80000 （不嗨可少喝酒） 嗨夜：90000 酒夜：85000 ⌛【马来西亚🇲🇾】单位：林吉特 🚩 中国妹妹 喝酒：3000 陪嗨：3000 快餐：5800 …
❤34👏14🎉12🔥9👍8🥰7🤩6👎3
😛😝😒😕😔😀😋 【鱼子酱】是一家专注于海外高端外围/包养的品牌，我们服务包含： 🚩 海外同城外围 🚩 海外妹妹包养 🚩 海外伴游陪玩 🚩 海外陪酒陪嗨 🚩 商务接待应酬 🚩 处女改运定制 🚩 其他私人订制 鱼子酱主打真实，不骗照，把口碑放第一位，经过一年过发展，目前我们已经在曼谷、吉隆坡、金边建立了自己的直营团队，目前我们服务涉及国家包括：泰国、马来西亚、新加坡、日本、柬埔寨等~ 部分地方女孩子最快可20分钟到达。 从鱼子酱出的包养妹妹，我们都是一口价，没有额外服务费，也没有介绍费，并且鱼子酱会一直追踪负责到底，中途不会出现女孩子额外要客户费用，亦或者是陪几天就跑路的情况。 我们也会提供额外定制服务，比如🔠处女服务，🔤M，3️⃣P，额外定制需私聊客服。
❤45🤩16🎉13🥰11🔥9👍6👏6
【鱼子酱】公告/介绍 pinned a photo
😛😝😒😕😔😀😋 【鱼子酱】常见问题解答 ⌛ 🚩 是否需要押金？ 如果在同一个城市包夜和包月都不需要押金！见面满意付款。 如果不在一个城市，需要客户支付200-2000u押金，用来购买往返机票、打车、过河费等一些费用。确定前会先视频验证，验证满意后才支付订金。 🚩 预订流程？ 在我们频道有看上的女孩可以直接转发我们客服，然后发具体位置（酒店客户需要拍房卡），客服会确定我们女孩是否空闲，如果当晚没空则会推荐其他空闲女孩子。女孩子到达客户指定位置，客户接到女孩子满意，则打款给我们客服提供收款码或者直接给女孩子。 🚩 能否先服务在付款？ 不可以。见到本人满意需打款，然后才安排服务。 🚩 是否可以安排进园区？ 可以。部分园区路程遥远，则需要客户提供车辆接送，若没有司机接送，则需要提前支付往返车费。 🚩 人照不一怎么办？ 所有妹妹均经过我们人事真人验证，验证通过才会发布频道，女孩子在出发前会发送视频核实，如果人照不一，则免费为客…
❤16🤩15👏14🔥14🎉13👍13🥰12
😛😝😒😕😔😀😋 【鱼子酱外围】— 交易流程 ⌛ （鱼子酱品牌同城不用支付任何定金，妹妹上门满意在付款！） 🚩 咨询客服，发送酒店/住所位置，并附上照片，有喜欢类型或者特殊要求可以提前告知客服； 🚩 客服发送当下空的女孩子，客户挑选要约的妹妹； 🚩 客服安排选中妹妹出发，到地方会发送所穿衣服照片，防止接错人； 🚩 接到女孩子，满意支付全款，收到钱后人事会通知妹妹开工； 🚩 客服第二天回访满意度，宝贝们对妹妹做服务评价~ 😆😊😭😐😄🥹😀😝😕 【鱼子酱包养】— 交易流程 ⌛ 包养妹妹需要支付定金，定金需要能覆盖来回往返交通费用，（若在同个城市则不需要费用）。 🚩 宝子们发送客服需求，见面城市地址，包养时间，特殊要求； 🚩 客服发送符合要求女孩子，客户挑选喜欢的妹妹，支付定金； 🚩 客服安排妹妹远程与宝子们视频，视频满意可以提前相互加联系方式先培养感情； 🚩 安排约定妹妹机票，见面宝子支付剩余…
👍21👏14🎉13🔥10🥰10🤩9❤8
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yzjfw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 9,915 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yzjfw named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【鱼子酱】公告/介绍” (@yzjfw), 5,724 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yzjfw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.