Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 66 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 906–1,029 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 20:45
1,014
-1
6 Oct 2026, 06:22
1,015
+29
26 Sept 2026, 03:39
986
+37
14 Sept 2026, 07:36
949
+5
7 Sept 2026, 03:02
944
+7
30 Aug 2026, 01:23
937
-5
23 Aug 2026, 06:42
942
+22
16 Aug 2026, 15:04
920
-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:00
923
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:22
923
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
53s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
44
34.1%
🔥
23
17.8%
💯
12
9.30%
👌
11
8.53%
🤝
8
6.20%
🤣
8
6.20%
👍
7
5.43%
😢
3
2.33%
🤗
3
2.33%
🥰
3
2.33%
👀
2
1.55%
😁
2
1.55%
🙏
2
1.55%
🤪
1
0.775%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yvdobychina_lawyer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Все хорошее имеет свойство заканчиваться, и мой алтайский отпуск не исключение.
Он пролетел стремительно, но оставил после себя такое тепло, которое сложно передать словами.
Это были не просто дни отдыха, а настоящий коллайдер эмоций: новые лица, искренние знакомства, ежевечерние посиделки в бане и ледяная горная речка, бодрящая лучше любого кофе.
Самое ценное - это энергия созидания, которой пропитан здесь каждый…
И пусть весь мир подождёт...
Улетаю на неделю в горный Алтай) Почти без связи и цивилизации.
Именно то, чего мне давно не хватало: тишина, горный воздух и время, чтобы ничего не решать и ни о чём не беспокоиться.
Обещаю отвечать на звонки и сообщения по возможности, но не сразу 😉
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уважаемые подписчики! 🙌
Сейчас то самое время, когда вести канал в прежнем активном темпе становится сложно. Охваты падают, энтузиазм немного угасает, а писать "в стол" совсем не хочется.
Чтобы я не выгорела, а вам было полезно, предлагаю пройти небольшой опрос.
Будьте так добры, ткните в нужные кнопки 👇
"Мы же устно договорились". Почему это самое опасное заблуждение при разводе.
В последнее время я все чаще слышу от клиентов одну и ту же фразу: "Мне только оформить развод, у нас нет споров по имуществу".
Но важно понять: действительно ли споров нет из‑за отсутствия совместно нажитого имущества или потому что пара просто договорилась "на словах"?
Часто имущество оформлено на одного супруга, тот второй вроде как н…
Ухожу в цифровой монастырь 🙈
Друзья, я сейчас в процессе большой "цифровой диеты".
Отписываюсь от сотен каналов, чтобы освободить голову.
Понимаю, что многие из вас видят эту отписку (я и сама периодически заглядываю в список подписок и вижу, кто ушел). Я знаю, что мы с вами больше года поддерживали друг друга взаимными подписками!
Но не принимайте на свой счет!
Просто в какой-то момент мой аккаунт превратился в…
Обратилась женщина за услугой сопровождения развода в мировом суде.
Оцениваю ситуацию, как простое дело, без имущественных и детских вопросов. Для развода в мировом суде не нужна терабайтная папка доказательств, достаточно нежелания истца продолжать брак.
И тут мелкий (или не очень, судите сами) курьёз 🙊. Когда я назвала стоимость своих услуг, на том конце провода послышалась сумма "плюс сто тысяч" к озвученной мн…
▶️ ПОЛЕЗНО
💬 Стандартный запрос на развод: ошибки, которые могут дорого стоить.
💬 "Не дам тебе развод" - что это значит на самом деле.
💬 "Отниму ребенка по суду и буду взыскивать алименты уже с тебя".
🆕🆕
💬 Важное объявление!
Новый канал MAX - «Де-юре vs Де-факто».
🎓БУДНИ ЮРИСТА
💬 "Нейросеть для судей. Решение суда за 5 минут".
🤔РЕФЛЕКСИЯ/ЗАМЕТКИ НА ПОЛЯХ
💬 Если ты будешь жить чужие жизни, то кто проживёт твою…
Развод с иностранцем в РФ.
В России брак с иностранцем расторгается по российскому законодательству.
Однако есть нюансы, которые важно учитывать берегу.
- Цель получения документа.
- Гражданство второго супруга.
- Место заключения брака.
Нужно ли решение суда о разводе исключительно для использования в РФ или планируется признавать его за границей (зависит от гражданства иностранца и наличия международных догово…
Важное объявление!
Теперь у меня появился новый публичный канал MAX - «Де-юре vs Де-факто».
https://max.ru/se13390005_biz
Сегодня мне стала доступна возможность открыть именно публичное пространство - с поиском и открытой подпиской.
Контент там совершенно другой и шире, чем только семейное право.
👉 О буднях юриста изнутри
👉 Реальные судебные кейсы
👉«Судебная кухня» без прикрас глазами практика
Очень хочу, что…
❤4👌4🤝2
Signed Юлия Добычина
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yvdobychina_lawyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СемьЯвправе | Юлия Добычина | Юрист” (@yvdobychina_lawyer), 1,014 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yvdobychina_lawyer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
