Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

yuniaa ✂️

@yuniaa_a

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,319subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816735018
TypeChannel
Username@yuniaa_a
Created24 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuniaa_a

Growth

1,3191,3241,321.56 August 2026 — 1,324 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,324 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,322 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,318–1,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:041,319-3
9 Aug 2026, 23:311,322-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:501,324no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:471,324first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 1,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held14 (3 July 202621 July 2026)
Views total3,716
Reactions total415
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈325 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вспомнила о своём старом скетче с элизопами, который так никогда и не увидел своего конца. кроме того что я перерисовала его щас #idv

19 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC≈427 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

спонтанно закидываю вас картинками с котами, чтобы ничего не проставивало #catwar

17 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC≈517 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

атаки на артф я решила постить пачками из трёх картинок, так что ждите.........................они в процессе.....................я точно не ебланю......

16 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC≈553 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

и еще, ради прикола я выложила свою основную кисть в ассеты за 10 клиппи (сначала хотела за 5, но ниже 10 нельзя…) так что, если вам интересно было или еще чего то вот!! https://assets.clip-studio.com/en-us/detail?id=2286788

16 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC≈553 views81 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

давайте я хотя бы покормлю вас спойлером, который в твиттере показывала #idv

16 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈465 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ребята, я болею, картинки если и рисуются то через силу. не бейте пж :(

15 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC≈483 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

у меня спонтанно получилось начать играть в днд, и вот в принципе я уже нарисовала персонажку туда #oc

8 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC≈718 views82 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вытираю свой пот с лица #cmm

6 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈794 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ребята...а кто-то шарит за гсгв.........я тут захотела нарисовать ли джехона...........ну так.....скромный вопросик....

5 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC≈921 views83 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

спустя стока лет сделала одному из осов нормальный референс #oc

4 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC≈6,060 views81 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

третий на подходе.... #3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @yuniaa_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 38,564 of 1,212,465entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Donatov.net - Донат есть! 💎
@donatovnet · 624,212
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“yuniaa ✂️” (@yuniaa_a), 1,319 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuniaa_a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.