https://blog.sorrycc.com/setup-new-mac 657 - 《如何 setup new mac》

Channel
云谦 · 自说自话
@yqtalk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,562subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001723722357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yqtalk |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yqtalk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 1,562 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 1,566 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,566 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.2%
- avg views ÷ 1,562 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 393
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 April 2026 – 15 July 2026) |
| Views total | 393 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 19 | 73.1% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 15.4% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 11.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://blog.sorrycc.com/gfw-2026 656 - 《科学上网》
https://blog.sorrycc.com/buy-09 645 - 《最近买的东西们(9)》 又攒了一波购物清单分享,从 Claude Max 20X、Mac Mini M4,到金豆、狗笼……贵的便宜的都有。 几个真香推荐: - Claude Max 20X:升级之后工作模式都变了,不再省 token,可以放心跑各种 loop - Obsidian Sync($4):又快又稳,手机/Mac mini/MBP 全设备打通 - Mac Mini 2024 M4:每个人都该有台 24 小时在跑的随身 Agent - UBNT UCG-Ultra:换完家里再没卡过
❤2
644 - 《Awesome Skills & Plugins》 https://blog.sorrycc.com/awesome-skills-plugins 整理了一份 Awesome Skills & Plugins 清单,收录 40+ 个 Claude Code / AI Agent 的 Skills、Plugins 和注册中心。
https://blog.sorrycc.com/release-helm 643 - 《Release Helm》 写了个基于 claude-agent-sdk 的 CLI 工具叫 Helm,聊聊背后的设计。
https://blog.sorrycc.com/multica 640 - 《Multica》 试了下 Multica,开源 Managed Agents Platform,部署到 Mac Mini M4 上跑。核心体验:创建 Issue 分配给 Agent,它自动领活、clone 仓库、干完流转到 In Review 等你终审。最有意思的发现是,CLI-first 的设计让我觉得它最合适的用户可能不是人类,是 Agent 本身。现阶段有用但不多,先装上当基础设施投资。
https://sokki.sorrycc.com/ 给 Sokki 搞了个网站,基于 Claude Design。
❤1
https://blog.sorrycc.com/ai-era-product-development 638 - 《从想法到上线,一到两天》 PD 写需求 → 设计师画图 → 开发写代码 → 测试验收 → 上线。这条链路已经过时了。现在就是 Dev → 上线,中间不传球。写了一篇聊 AI 时代产品开发流程怎么变的。
Tot 两天持续丢 Note 数据,考虑也自己写一个了。
在阿里(蚂蚁)也成年了
👏17🎉3
给 Sokki 加了 ai 功能(未发布)。
https://blog.sorrycc.com/agent-friendly-cli 638 - 《编写 AI Agent 友好的 CLI》 2026 年了,AI Agent 最好用的接口不是 MCP,是 CLI。但大部分 CLI 对 Agent 是敌意设计。整理了 8 条规则 + 可以直接抄的 Node.js 骨架。 注:这篇全部由 AI 完成,下午写 CLI 感觉味不对,需要一些输入,就收集了下信息。为了方便后续继续喂给 AI,就让他接着理了篇文章。
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yqtalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,003,206 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“云谦 · 自说自话” (@yqtalk), 1,562 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yqtalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.