Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YQ's Crypto Club

@yqreads

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,661subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003163540606
TypeChannel
Username@yqreads
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yqreads

Growth

1,6611,6651,6637 August 2026 — 1,665 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,665 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,661 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,660–1,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:561,661-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:031,665no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,665first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7264.9%
🔥3430.6%
👀21.80%
👍21.80%
😈10.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC527 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2064006143236792391?s=20 How New SaaS Buries Old SaaS — As machine intelligence gets ~80% cheaper a year and consumption climbs into the quadrillions, enterprise software's unit of value is shifting from the human seat to the metered token, repricing seat-based incumbents (Salesforce −32% in 2026) while token-metered software compounds. The brief argues value lands in the layer that meter

3

30 May 2026, 14:46 UTC862 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2060733933114007776?s=20 A $0.50 model just beat Claude Opus 4.8 on a coding leaderboard. On http://nextjs.org/evals Vercel's own benchmark, Cursor's Composer 2.5 is #1 at 92%. Opus 4.8 is #2 at 88%. Composer is faster, ~10× cheaper.

4

29 May 2026, 23:37 UTC791 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2060505519140569531?s=20 . @claudeai Opus 4.8 is the rare model release that leads on the metric nobody markets: knowing what it doesn't know. Strongest published case yet for reduced confident wrongness, though much of evidence is @AnthropicAI 's own.

5

7 May 2026, 15:15 UTC919 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2052405907431338392?s=20 Why DeepSeek and GPT need AltCode to beat Claude Code. Anthropic's terms stop third-party tools from reselling Claude Code subs. The harness is the moat. AltCode is the open-source counter. https://altcode.io https://github.com/jiayaoqijia/altcode

🔥51

29 Apr 2026, 18:53 UTC≈1,030 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Yet another model, why crypto needs AltLLM https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2049562323573264678?s=20 https://x.com/usealtai/status/2049471763286053083?s=20

🔥3

24 Apr 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Capability is abundant. Price is the variable being optimised. https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2047689256144158928?s=20

4👀2

9 Apr 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,130 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2042270303951405361?s=20 @Google Quantum: <500K qubits can crack ECDSA in 9 min. @Bitcoin block time: 10 min. Attacker wins the race 41% of time. 6.9M BTC exposed. The most consequential security paper since Satoshi's whitepaper. But defense was published 2 years ago. We got an impl of the defense at altpq.com https://github.com/jiayaoqijia/altpq.

4😈1

6 Apr 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,010 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2041174018016051532?s=20 In 2011, @pmarca wrote that software is eating the world. In 2026, the sequel: software is eating software. AI companies are capturing revenue from the software companies that captured revenue from everyone else. $1 trillion moved in a single month. The pie is not getting bigger. The knife is getting sharper. $2.52T in AI spending. Zero GDP contribution. Margi

4

31 Mar 2026, 15:04 UTC879 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2038995222525591632?s=20 The hard problem in AI-assisted coding is not generation quality but execution reliability.

7

27 Mar 2026, 17:29 UTC915 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2037582006532665382?s=20 The internet's business model is advertising. $300B/yr Google, $135B Meta, $50B Amazon. All assume a human clicking. AI agents don't click ads. They don't watch pre-roll or impulse-buy. That changes everything. A must read for @stripe @tempo @mpp vs @coinbase @base x402 Payments are a commodity. Trust is a moat.

8

25 Mar 2026, 19:52 UTC768 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2036892430029799768?s=20 Bet continues with @VitalikButerin. After 1 month, http://ETH2030.com's devnet is running. FOCIL inclusion lists. Frame transactions. Native AA. BAL parallel execution. All producing blocks on a 6-node network.

3👍2🔥2

23 Mar 2026, 05:11 UTC767 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/yq_acc/status/2035303662088823266?s=20 Before the App Store, iPhone devs used ad hoc channels. Every platform needs a registry. Then building explodes. Crypto AI agents just got theirs. 477 skills. 221 official. @ethereum @base @BNBCHAIN @solana https://cryptoskill.org https://github.com/nicholasgriffintn/cryptoskill

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yqreads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YQ's Crypto Club” (@yqreads), 1,661 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yqreads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.