4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,495–4,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:57
4,552
+22
11 Aug 2026, 12:39
4,530
+26
8 Aug 2026, 10:20
4,504
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:17
4,502
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 4,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
979
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
34 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
32,302
Reactions total
2,723
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
47m 12s
Average length
2m 03s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,723 reactions across 33 posts, in 95 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5274202135632846511
278
10.2%
custom 5274127416086799263
244
8.96%
custom 5406927431216963654
231
8.48%
custom 5350283675940460327
216
7.93%
🤯
197
7.23%
👏
155
5.69%
😁
138
5.07%
🔥
111
4.08%
custom 5199422666200614829
98
3.60%
custom 5330465833548289442
80
2.94%
custom 5449874995348018939
68
2.50%
❤
59
2.17%
😢
55
2.02%
custom 5438594512853182354
54
1.98%
custom 5244777181543957153
50
1.84%
custom 5194941035330965689
42
1.54%
👍
38
1.40%
custom 5199441478157370140
33
1.21%
custom 5213359805011346584
28
1.03%
custom 5199629580545066438
26
0.955%
75 further kinds
522
19.2%
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,723reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yplspilnota. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💪🇺🇦 Український фахівець Андрій Демченко вивів грузинську "Іберію" до раунду плей-оф кваліфікації Ліги Європи — а це означає, що вперше за 22 сезони грузинський клуб зіграє в основній стадії єврокубка 👏👏👏
🇬🇪 Останнім грузинським клубом, який грав у груповому/основному етапі єврокубків, було "Динамо" Тбілісі у сезоні 2004/05 (Кубок УЄФА).
🇺🇦Віктор Вацко - про фол Крістіана Біловара на Блері на 15-й хвилині матчу з "Вересом" :
"Я вважаю, що арбітри повинні були вилучати Біловара. Цей фол - не що інше, як фол останньої надії. Судді знову засцяли вилучити Крістіана Біловара.
⠀
Вам усі люди, які хоч трохи пограли у футбол, скажуть, що Блер втікав від захисників "Динамо" фактично як на буліт у хокеї. Просто гляньте скрін: Біловар відіграний, Тіаре відста…
🤐Інсайдерам на замітку : у Туреччині затримали журналіста через фейкову новину про Джамала Мусіалу!
👀Спортивний журналіст Бурхан Джан Терзі був затриманий поліцією за звинуваченням у “поширенні неправдивої інформації серед громадськості” : Терзі повідомляв про те, атакувальний хавбек "Баварії" Джамал Мусіала приєднається до "Галатасараю" навіть після того як турецький клуб офіційно спростував цю інформацію! Журналіс…
👍🥇🥇 В’ячеслав Танковський повторив рекорд УПЛ за кількістю клубів у кар’єрі : 30-річний півзахисник вже встиг пограти одразу за дев'ять українських команд: "Зорю", "Шахтар", "Маріуполь", "Арсенал", "Металіст", "Дніпро-1", "Полісся", "ЛНЗ" та "Буковину".
📊 Раніше заграні за 9 різних клубів чемпіонату України були лише Володимир Лисенко, Валерій Федорчук та Павло Полегенько.
🇫🇷🇺🇦🇺🇦 Ілля Забарний - у заявці ПСЖ на матч за Суперкубок УЄФА!
🇫🇷🆚⚽Завтра, 12 серпня у Зальцбурзі о 22:00 за київським часом переможець Ліги Чемпіонів сезону 2025/2026 ПСЖ зіграє проти Астон Вілли, яка цього року тріумфувала в Лізі Європи.
😳 Голкіпер "Шахтаря" Кіріл Фесюн наразі змушений зосередитися на відновленні здоров’я через серйозні наслідки інфекції після укусу кліща. За інформацією журналіста Ігоря Бурбаса, у Кіріла через пізнє виявлення укусу кліща розвинувся інфекційний процес, що призвіло до запалення внутрішніх органів, зокрема серця :
«В підсумку відбулося ураження організму інфекцією. Це призвело до запалення внутрішніх органів. І найбіл…
⚽🇺🇦Головний тренер "Челсі" Хабі Алонсо - про українського вінгера лондонців Михайла Мудрика :
"Я хочу, щоб Мудрик залишився. Я готовий допомогти йому повернутися до найкращої версії себе".
ℹ️ 30 липня футбольна асоціація Англії (FA) офіційно повідомила про завершення дисциплінарної справи щодо українського півзахисника "Челсі" Михайла Мудрика : FA та футболіст за погодженням зі Всесвітнім антидопінговим агентством…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @yplspilnota. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 281,659 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“УПЛ і СПІЛЬНОТА” (@yplspilnota), 4,552 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yplspilnota.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
