6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,716–2,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 07:00
2,719
-4
4 Sept 2026, 02:02
2,723
-5
31 Aug 2026, 16:03
2,728
-8
28 Aug 2026, 11:33
2,736
-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:45
2,740
no change
27 Aug 2026, 16:30
2,740
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3,109 reactions across 19 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
947
30.5%
❤🔥
736
23.7%
❤
618
19.9%
🤯
241
7.75%
👍
127
4.08%
🕊
95
3.06%
👌
44
1.42%
💋
44
1.42%
🥰
38
1.22%
✍
23
0.74%
🐳
23
0.74%
💘
23
0.74%
👀
21
0.675%
🤔
19
0.611%
🫡
17
0.547%
⚡
15
0.482%
😱
12
0.386%
☃
11
0.354%
🍾
10
0.322%
🦄
10
0.322%
16 further kinds
35
1.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 29 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yegor_lda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2025 to 29 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Месяц в тени — каков результат?
Я на месяц ушёл в режим молчания, чтобы сосредоточиться на «Тотальном разборе» (и немного на учёбе, куда без неё). Что из этого вышло?
Хорошие новости: большая часть работы уже позади. Я собрал много интересной информации, которой не видел у других ютуберов😮💨
Всего в видео 9 глав. 5 из них уже написаны. Остались главы поменьше, а также озвучка и монтаж.
🎵 И ещё: теперь я сразу инт…
Потерянный стрим восстановлен🥳
Месяц назад я стримил R.E.P.O., и у меня отключилось электричество. Запись в OBS сломалась, стрим не сохранился. Однако YouTube сам сохраняет записи трансляций, хоть и в несколько шакальном качестве.
Бонусом к этому — всю игру записывал Герман! 🏆
Получилось использовать эти две записи, чтобы создать очень смешную нарезку. Она уже доступна на втором канале!
https://youtu.be/_HJvoAtd4…
ВАШИ ТЕОРИИ📝
Давненько я не публиковал теории от подписчиков! Сегодня хотел бы показать вам теорию от Альмы. Полную теорию можно прочитать по ссылке: https://t.me/yegorldachat/47552/64704
200 дней в Закулисье | Вселенский ветер
1️⃣ Егор Льда является особым существом, способным перемещаться между мирами без каких-либо подручных средств. Именно это его свойство заинтересовало таинственную Федерацию - организацию, ко…
😨 Только не говорите что о̶͎̥͐͜͝н̸̦̤͈̱̀͂̄͑̋͜ͅо̶̘̏̽͛ близко..
Ж У Т К О красивый арт от госпожи из ТГК "Скарабяне". Мои ощущения при встрече с Н И М переданы идеально. Слава Богу, все это закончилось...
Ссылка на автора: https://t.me/scarabei_comic
Хуже детского контента⁉️
Вы когда-нибудь думали: "блин, вот бы Закулисье на деле оказалось личным адом для отца-детоубийцы". Нет? Никогда не посещала такая мысль? А вот авторов эпизода "Закулисье" сериала "Американские истории ужасов" - посетила, и результатом стал сомнительный мини хоррор-фильм.
1️⃣ Мало лиминальности - лиминальный хоррор тут есть, но его очень мало. Зрителей в основном "пугают" странными выходкам…
АМ?!?! Вызовите полицию милоты?!?! 😍
Этот прекрасный скетч нам предоставил господин Пуше.
Вообще у этого человека потрясающий стиль, я заказывал у него все нужные мне арты до того как нашим главным художником стала Слопа. Очень рекомендую посетить ТГК и посмотреть другие работы!
🦠 Пещерное выживание разгадано 🦠
Спустя почти 5 лет после выхода пещерного выживания его главная тайна была раскрыта. Всё благодаря теории одного из участников чата - EliteJust. Ему удалось:
1️⃣ Понять природу Э Р Л Л А и заражения Фуфлика;
2️⃣ Раскрыть замыслы и идеологию загадочного "Культа Древних";
3️⃣ А также узнать скрытый смысл выживания - противостояние двух взглядов на смысл жизни человека.
Теорию можно п…
🔥90❤🔥13👀13❤8👍2🤔2🤯2🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yegor_lda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие из этих видео вы бы посмотрели (исходя только из названия)?
Этот майнкрафт мир меня... ЛЮБИТ?48%
Закулисье МЕРТВО. Тотальный разбор61%
Эта игра - шедевр. Вы в неё не играли29%
3 Ютубера - 3 Хоррор мода32%
Ничего из вышеперечисленного6%
The shares total 176%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 29 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Павук (swag) @pavuk228 · 42,150 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Корова из майнкрафта / Бурёночек @Burenochek · 45,086 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Егор Льда” (@yegor_lda), 2,719 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yegor_lda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
