小雅播报 pinned a photo
Channel
小雅播报
@yayapd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,373subscribers
+1,215 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004466719772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yayapd |
| Created | 7 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yayapd |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 1,373 | +40 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 1,333 | +50 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 1,283 | +113 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 1,170 | +1,012 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:23 | 158 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 158 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 7 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 74.0%
- avg views ÷ 1,373 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.265%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 September 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,079 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 08:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
小雅播报 pinned a photo
闪闪 @Sparkle060 雅雅 @yaya16686 课费:3kp 60min、 5.6kpp 90min、 内容:制服诱惑 口 69,各种姿势爱爱 可演情节 配合超默契哦 简介:双飞p为出一次,中途支持换套换人。pp为两次。 可制定高跟,定制服装各种职业装,情趣,包臀裙 禁无套,低素质,磕药,桩机,醉酒 定金约课鸽子不退
❤2
【优势】颜值身材 【劣势】无舌吻 【妹子花名】:雅雅&闪闪 【联系方式】:@yaya16686 & @Sparkle060 【妹子年龄】:22 【验证留名】:小黄人 【验证时间】:9月8日 【修车水费】:1600p+3000双飞 【颜值】:两个都还可以 颜值评分:13分/13分 (满分15分) 【身材】:雅170,正常肤色,科技胸C/闪165,偏白肤色,科技胸C 身材评分:13分/13分 (满分15分) 【服务态度】:都很配合 服务评分:15分( 满分15分) 【情绪价值】:交流愉快,三个人聊天比较逗 情绪评分:15分 (满分15分) 【时间管理】:时间充足 时间评分:10分 (满分10分) 【同价位合理性】:符合价位 价位评分:10分 (满分10分) 【卫生环境】:事前事后自助清洗,课室干净,方便停车,出入比以前方便了 环境评分:10分 (满分10分) 【额外加分项】:无风尘味 …
半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】 颜值高 身材好 大长腿 【不足】🈚️ 【妹子花名】:#雅雅 【联系方式】:@yaya16686 【妹子年龄】:2x+ 【验证留名】:tang 【验证时间】:9月8日 【大概位置】:萧山 【修车水费】:1600p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:颜值高,身材好 【身高身材】:身高173,🈚️纹身,皮肤手感好 【凶器罩杯】:胸型b,乳头颜色/大小,整体手感不错 【湿度紧度】:户型粉,湿度紧度💯,周围毛量少 【环境细节】:地铁直达,环境干净整洁 【个人卫生】:不抽烟,有漱口水/牙刷/浴巾,事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,该有的都有 【服务点评】:服务到位,无少做,态度很好 【推荐程度】:✅ 差评 中评 中好评 好评…
❤3
今天开课
Channel name was changed to «小雅播报»
🧚♀️ 雅雅 🧚♀️ 🧚♀️开课时段:12:00-20:00点 🧚♀️身高172/47kg 34C 大长腿 年龄22 🧚♀️足交/调情/無套口/69/爱爱 🧚♀️高跟/丝袜/制服诱惑 🧚♀️热情活泼,女友感,整活主动,可咸可甜 🧚♀️1600p 60分钟 🧚♀️3000pp 90分钟 🧚♀️下午茶 4500 3小时 3次 🧚♀️ ✌🏻1W 包天1.5 🧚♀️20min不💦换👋 🧚♀️禁五套三通 醉酒 桩机 偷拍大🍆 🧚♀️第一次约课需要支付100定金,鸽子定金不退 🧚♀️兼职随缘开课 约课联系: @yaya16686 双向机器人:@yayashappy_bot
❤3
Channel name was changed to «666频道»
Channel name was changed to «666»
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @yayapd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小雅播报” (@yayapd), 1,373 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yayapd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.