Other / unclassifiable โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 79 days, net -234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 7,546โ7,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 10:48
7,581
-8
21 Oct 2026, 17:45
7,589
-7
18 Oct 2026, 06:48
7,596
-4
15 Oct 2026, 07:49
7,600
-13
11 Oct 2026, 21:18
7,613
-17
5 Oct 2026, 15:14
7,630
-35
27 Sept 2026, 23:18
7,665
-27
18 Sept 2026, 19:38
7,692
-12
14 Sept 2026, 18:38
7,704
-14
11 Sept 2026, 05:15
7,718
-12
6 Sept 2026, 16:22
7,730
-11
2 Sept 2026, 05:24
7,741
-22
30 Aug 2026, 01:46
7,763
-4
26 Aug 2026, 20:57
7,767
+16
23 Aug 2026, 22:05
7,751
-18
20 Aug 2026, 00:27
7,769
-10
16 Aug 2026, 19:26
7,779
-15
13 Aug 2026, 02:53
7,794
-5
9 Aug 2026, 22:14
7,799
-14
6 Aug 2026, 12:01
7,813
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 84 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
2,783 reactions across 78 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
2,294
82.4%
๐ฏ
156
5.61%
๐
144
5.17%
๐
44
1.58%
๐
30
1.08%
๐
29
1.04%
๐
25
0.898%
๐ฆ
20
0.719%
๐
16
0.575%
๐ฅฐ
12
0.431%
๐
6
0.216%
๐ค
6
0.216%
๐
1
0.036%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @yassmina1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sara.aigabih @Sara_aigabih ยท 38,591 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 11 September 2026
ูุนู ุฉ โพ๏ธneama ๐พ @neamasal ยท 21,862 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 21 September 2026
ุชุฌู ุน ุงูู ุชูุฏู ูู ููุธุงุฆู ู ุฌูุณ ุงูุฎุฏู ุฉ ุงูุนุงู ุฉ ุงูุงุชุญุงุฏู ุงูุนุฑุงูู @Se_rviceJobs1 ยท 24,985 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 15 September 2026
ุบูุฑ ุญูุงุชู ู ุน ุฏ ุฑูุงุญูู @raya369 ยท 23,900 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 16 September 2026
ุจูุงุช ุฑูู ๐ฟ @girlsreeem ยท 26,573 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ุงุตูููุน ูุงููุนูู ู ุน ูุงุฑู ู ๐โ (@yassmina1), 7,581 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yassmina1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.