Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Полищук. Сексолог.

Channel

Ольга Полищук. Сексолог.

@yanylove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,303subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185294339
TypeChannel
Username@yanylove
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yanylove

Growth

1,2801,3031,291.57 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,296 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,299 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,301 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,277–1,306 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 14:331,303+2
24 Aug 2026, 15:371,301+2
20 Aug 2026, 16:461,299+1
17 Aug 2026, 18:161,298+2
14 Aug 2026, 18:131,296+7
11 Aug 2026, 03:041,289+9
7 Aug 2026, 10:471,280no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:351,280first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 1,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (24 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,368
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5847.9%
3629.8%
👍64.96%
❤‍🔥43.31%
👏32.48%
💯32.48%
😁32.48%
🤗32.48%
💋21.65%
🥰21.65%
🤣10.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC152 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фильм про то, как звучат голоса в нашей голове во время знакомства, секса, общения Мужской и женский внутренний мир Как по мне, много попаданий;)

6🔥1🤣1

Signed Olga Davydenko

4 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC180 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Например, вчера в чате я выложила техники массажа 🍌, а потом следом записала аудио, о том, как я вижу зрелую любовь и как приходить к близости в отношениях В этом чате не про порноштампы, не просто куда нажать, там много и про секс и про чувства, не всегда простые. Иногда мы обмениваемся фотками, чтобы бодрить друг друга, иногда рассказываем про свой секс. Иногда грустим про что-то в отношениях. Там есть все про от

1

Signed Olga Davydenko

4 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC158 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У меня есть чат KISSki Это наш уютный, бережный и откровенный мир Причина моего вчерашнего скачка эндорфина и просто счастья сексолога у вас на экране☝️ Я очень дорожу каждым таким сообщением от моих женщин. Очень.

🔥13

Signed Olga Davydenko

1 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC257 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Большая история про близость из подсмотренной на улице чьей-то семейной истории

5💯3🤗3

Signed Olga Davydenko

31 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC311 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Я нашла у себя интервью, ему лет 5, где мы обсуждали очень откровенные вопросы В интервью много мата, слов, которые не любит цензура, но как по мне, очень по теме получилось Rutube нам заблочил видео YouTube пропустил: https://youtu.be/dWID8HpK79A?si=Ztw0fInZ27NIDi_o

❤‍🔥4🥰1

Signed Olga Davydenko

30 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC310 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда женщина - Женщина в отношениях? а как еще бывает? например, она доченька, мамочка, малышка, пацан, мужик, братан, Зена - королева воинов…. Она: 1️⃣ Не превращает своего мужчину в секс-попрошайку, когда она главный бухгалтер, а рабочий предприятия приходит боязливо спросить, а дадут ли сегодня зарплату Она не дарует секс, как киндер сюрприз, если мальчик получил пятерку в школе или убрался в комнате. Она з

16🔥10👏3

Signed Olga Davydenko

29 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC261 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вчера у нас был вебинар по теме отношений со своим оргазмом Что влияет Что отключает Как поговорить о об этом с мужчиной + обсуждение с девушками их вопросов и эмоций в этой теме Запись можно приобрести , написав мне в директ @olgayany Кусочки из встречи прикрепила

3🥰1

Signed Olga Davydenko

28 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC303 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

М? Здесь мы точно разделимся в реакции. Кто-то кайфанет и разыграет фантазию, а кто-то скажет «а че это она?»

🔥9

Signed Olga Davydenko

26 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC345 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одна из частых причин невозможности женщины со всей головой нырнуть в оргазм, то есть его ненаступление, это неправильный ритм разгон не в тот момент начинаем бежать тогда, когда стоило бы вдоволь обойти все уголочки… Ничего непонятно, но очень интересно? Во вторник будет вебинар по женской оргазмичности. Можно будет потом запись послушать и со своим мужчиной. Отвечу на вопросы, разберу ситуации, если принесете

🔥61

Signed Olga Davydenko

24 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC391 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣8️⃣ ВЕБИНАР 28.07: «Хочу другой оргазм» Онлайн женская встреча для изменения своих отношений с оргастичностью🔥 О чём будем говорить: #️⃣ Почему оргазм - это не про «делай так», а про сексуальный интеллект и женщины, и мужчины 🔣 Как не терять нить возбуждения, когда вокруг дети, работа и быт #️⃣ Что такое «газ» и «тормоз» в твоей сексуальной системе 📱 Какие совсем несексуальные стимулы заводят

👍6💋21

Signed Olga Davydenko

24 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уже все есть и у нас Все узнала Mancore - фитнес камастура для мужчин. Для мужского здоровья, чувствительности и его счастливой девочки😈 Ну всё! Женскую голову, психологию оргазмов частично беру на себя, остальное за вами;)

🔥7

Signed Olga Davydenko

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yanylove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 559,594 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Полищук. Сексолог.” (@yanylove), 1,303 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanylove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.