Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for янатико

Channel

янатико

@yanatiko1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,539subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005842171
TypeChannel
Username@yanatiko1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/yanatiko1

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,39314,61414,503.57 August 2026 — 14,614 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,608 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,605 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,598 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,590 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,585 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,581 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,573 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,563 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,554 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,548 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,541 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,539 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,534 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,530 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,519 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,515 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,507 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,502 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,497 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,495 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,489 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,482 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,474 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,467 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,471 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,464 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,458 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,448 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,444 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,422 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,393 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,584 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,572 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,567 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,563 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,553 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,550 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,543 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,539 subscribers14,5397 August 202623 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 77 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,360–14,647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 00:0114,539-4
21 Oct 2026, 20:3514,543-7
20 Oct 2026, 14:4914,550-3
19 Oct 2026, 14:0514,553-10
17 Oct 2026, 10:5614,563-4
15 Oct 2026, 13:0914,567-5
14 Oct 2026, 14:0514,572-12
8 Oct 2026, 22:0114,584+191
4 Oct 2026, 15:1514,393-29
26 Sept 2026, 11:1814,422-22
17 Sept 2026, 11:2014,444-4
15 Sept 2026, 12:1714,448-10
13 Sept 2026, 23:0014,458-6
12 Sept 2026, 08:4114,464-7
10 Sept 2026, 05:1914,471+4
6 Sept 2026, 20:0014,467-7
4 Sept 2026, 05:2014,474-8
2 Sept 2026, 21:4314,482-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:2614,489-6
29 Aug 2026, 19:0414,495first reading

Engagement

259 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 259 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,382 reactions across 247 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,09048.8%
😢1,58318.9%
😁1,18014.1%
🔥99911.9%
👍1932.30%
🥰1051.25%
👏951.13%
🤔710.847%
🙏660.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 254 of the 259 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 258 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yanatiko1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 259 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC521 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Да меня и семья засаживает. Друзья мало понимают, но все равно поддерживают, но я с ними не живу. Но тут очень, оооооочень сложно. Я хочу обучение провести, духом собраться, это очень сложно для меня после всех неудач, но я в глазах у него буду «инфоцыганкой». На других похер, но как он ненавидит блогеров, инфлюренсиров да и вообще удаленьщиков. Диагноз: «Не несут пользу обществу»!

🤔4❤2

2 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC551 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Это плохие отношения, где партнер тебя вместо поддержки, засаживает. Потому крайне не логично за них держаться.

👍18👏4

2 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC642 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Я просто понимаю, что он в каких-то вещах прав. Я неряха, но он тоже. Я сплю до 10-11 (уже), но он днём приходит отсыпается и мне предъявляет, что я много сплю. Я не худею, но и он не тоже. Как бы… что? Возвышаться над до мной то, что окончил ВУЗ и работает по специальности? Но мне хватило смелости еще 8 лет заниматься тем, что мне нравится. Я люблю блогинг! Я живу эзотерикой! Это то, что делает меня счастливой… …

❤13🥰1

2 Sept 2026, 18:04 UTC704 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Если ты ничего не меняешь, значит ты не устала. Без негатива Так и есть Когда человек устает, он что-то меняет Неужели приятно слушать ежедневные упреки в свой адрес? За что ты держишься? Будто тебя осыпают бриллиантами, оплачивают тебе все на свете, носят на руках и поддерживают во всём. Нет ровном счетом ничего за что можно было бы держаться. Ты просто с помощью Алексея еще больше убиваешь себе самооценку, и как бу…

👍22❤13

2 Sept 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,610 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Я постоянно в напряжении. У меня и так нет окружения в Ростове единомышленников. Тяжело ежедневно ловить агрессию на мой образ жизни. Причем мои близкие подруги спокойно монетизируют свои хобби и их обеспечивают мужчины. Он тоже этим не доволен, женщина должна быть самодостаточная, а не на шеи у мужчины. Окей, с этим можно жить, но я же зарабатываю свою копейку как раз таки на блоге и астрологии! Я стараюсь, прик…

😢19❤5

2 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,800 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Лешу не устраивает, что я блогер и астролог. Хочет мне нормальную работу, ведь скоро всех блогеров прикроют. Мне надоело это слушать я ему сказала: «Я не буду работать на «нормальной» работе. Ты либо принимаешь и перестаешь мне высказывать все это, либо расстаемся. Он: «Хорошо, расстаемся»

😢37🙏8

2 Sept 2026, 17:21 UTC≈2,110 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

вы реально думаете тут проблема в корнях? 😁

😁25🔥4👍3

2 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈2,250 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

как будто не 10 лет прошло, а все тридцать… + одна психотравма «фото в правах»

😁23😢10

2 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,330 views59 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Я гуляла быстрым шагом 80 минут. Похвалите, меня, пожалуйста. Алексий только ехидно с ноткой саркастичной агрессии сказал: «Ого?Пешком?У тебя же аллергия на хотьбу» Я расстроена такой реакцией… Моя рачья натура сегодня хочет одобрения 🥲

🔥36❤12👏6😁4😢1

31 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈6,120 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

вот просто сравниваю… самый комплекс - декольте у меня постоянно там были прыщи… у меня еще воспаление были либо белые мелкие, которые каждое утро нужно было лопать, либо огромные волдыри, которые под тональником были еще хуже( это еще божеский до/после без розацеи… п.с. - хорошо, что губы сдула…

❤41😢7👏3

31 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈6,140 views73 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

я снова начала фоткаться в любой момент и даже со вспышкой ❤️ как блогер для меня это очень важно!

🔥41❤17😢10👍4🤔1

31 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈2,650 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤14🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 259 posts we hold for @yanatiko1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@yanatiko1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

вы бы на партнера возмущались?

  1. да15%
  2. пох вообще87%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 259 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Romanova.blog
@allaRomonoVa · 88,362
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 October 2026
Мурчание
@murchanielerochki · 19,328
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“янатико” (@yanatiko1), 14,539 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanatiko1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.