Channel
@xzsndp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,412subscribers
+158 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003580512467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xzsndp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xzsndp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 5,412 | +87 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 5,325 | +30 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 5,295 | +39 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 5,256 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 5,254 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 5,254 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,547 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【时间】：2026-08-19 【老师】：娜娜多姿 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：9.33 人照评分：9 颜值评分：9 身材评分：9 服务评分：9.5 态度评分：9.5 环境评分：10 整体描述：新来的娜娜老师蛮漂亮，很好看， 联系老师谈好时间地点， 驱车前往遥控上楼进门，一眼很美有肉感。交付水费洗澡帮擦， 开始服务很全面， 舌吻管够。 户型很美一摸出水， 进入主题很润，舒服。 姿势比较简单， 后入出水。 老实人美很幽默， 二次大战后休息后相拥回家，值得二刷。
【时间】：2026-08-19 【老师】：柳儿 【评价人】：Ragnar 综合评分：9.92 人照评分：10 颜值评分：10 身材评分：10 服务评分：10 态度评分：10 环境评分：9.5 整体描述：再探徐州，晚上约了柳儿老师过夜，因为看过很多次老师卸妆的样子，外加不喜欢被化妆品蹭到，所以特意要求老师不化妆，保持素颜，开门后，素颜的老师也还是那么动人，寒暄过后，准备干饭，老师的位置很不错，外卖来的很快，由于惊声尖叫系列已经刷完经典的前几部了，所以这次改换国产喜剧下饭，在欢笑中吃完缓了缓，看到老师娇嫩的容颜，灵动的双眸，大家对上了眼神，嗯，确认行动，接下来又是一番鏖战，鏖战过后休息聊天，看到时间已经来到了第二天，19号，和老师拥抱了一下，道一声七夕快乐，然后再次沉溺在老师的温柔乡之中，腰酸腿酸之后，相拥入睡。。。最后早上起来和老师依依不舍的拥抱告别 柳儿老师的颜值很高，明显能看出混血的痕迹，底子也好，从来不怕素颜出现，很多次睡前…
【时间】：2026-08-19 【老师】：云舒 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：6.83 人照评分：8 颜值评分：7 身材评分：7 服务评分：7 态度评分：6 环境评分：6 整体描述：好久没出击了 怕给二弟憋坏了 水群呢正好遇到及时雨大哥赞助1000积分 拍卖全部错过 正好今天看到新来的老师 果断换券出击 问了老师大概位置 导航直接出发 老师可能还没来及租房子 在小酒店住的 因为去得特别晚了凌晨2点多 半路上遇到个过路警车 吓完了 老师指路来到房间门口 听到里面有打呼噜声音 感觉不对 然后另一间门开了 老师记错房间号了还好窍门声音不大 直接进入正题 进门先验券 然后我先洗 跟老师说路上遇到个警车老师也紧张了 让我快些 直接躺下老师口活很不错 没有齿感 也有深喉 先是传教士 累的不行了老师在上面 因为床的原因加隔音不好 看得出来限制了老师发挥 老师一直问有没有感觉 老师一直催最后123结束 总结老师可能因为住酒店隔音不好 所以催着…
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：弦子 【评价人】：随风而去 综合评分：8.75 人照评分：8 颜值评分：8.5 身材评分：8 服务评分：9.5 态度评分：9.5 环境评分：9 整体描述：服务很好，比洗浴里的好很多，细致到位舒服，95和98比也是可以偶尔试试
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：雅雅 【评价人】：北溪 综合评分：8.67 人照评分：9 颜值评分：9 身材评分：8 服务评分：9 态度评分：9 环境评分：8 整体描述：丙午孟秋，八月既望之后，十八之夕。风清夜静，月华流照。余独行于尘陌，灯火参差，人声渐敛。 忽逢斯人，神仪温雅，气度雍和。言笑温润，如沐清光；举止娴舒，不染浮俗。初见恍若旧识，相逢竟似天缘。片言相晤，心意暗通，尘俗纷扰，一时尽散。 嗟乎，人海茫茫，岁月驰往，俯仰之间，多是萍踪过客。不期此夕，邂逅良人。素未谋面，而神思相契；初遇相逢，而情愫暗生。良时难再，佳会罕逢，幸今夜之相逢，慰平生之怅惘。 愿此邂逅，不为倏忽一梦。记此宵之遇，铭于心间，以待来日。 🐍真的做到了管够
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：朵薇 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：8.83 人照评分：9 颜值评分：8 身材评分：8 服务评分：10 态度评分：10 环境评分：8 整体描述：92天花板，是我目前做过体验最好的一次，一进门老师就给拿水切好水果了，洗澡也帮忙擦拭，还给按摩，一点也不赶时间，服务非常细致，课表上的服务都有，最后足交出货，爽飞了，兄弟们放心冲好吧
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：菲菲 【评价人】：童锦程 综合评分：8.63 人照评分：8 颜值评分：8 身材评分：7 服务评分：10 态度评分：10 环境评分：8.8 整体描述：不说虚的，老师口活真的顶，cj到现在第一次给老师直接口出来，连b都没沾上，二刷必须沾b
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：叶子 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：9 人照评分：9 颜值评分：9 身材评分：9 服务评分：9 态度评分：9 环境评分：9 整体描述：人照无差啊兄弟们 ，是我的菜真的很顶 无脑cj了兄弟们
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：奶茶 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：8.5 人照评分：8 颜值评分：8 身材评分：9 服务评分：9 态度评分：9 环境评分：8 整体描述：奶茶老师 典型的小嫩妹，还有服务真的很顶，🐻很挺人瘦瘦的喜欢嫩妹的可以冲了兄弟们
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：叶子 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：9.55 人照评分：9.5 颜值评分：9.5 身材评分：9.8 服务评分：9.5 态度评分：9.5 环境评分：9.5 整体描述：见到本服务也挺好，很嫩的女神，看课表还有服务，精虫上脑，约好了时间，遥控上门，课室位置好找，方便停车，一进门很惊喜，保藏来的，本来和照片一样，身材高挑，一看就小，交了课费，老师帮忙洗完，洗的很仔细，上床服务，课表上的都有，服务就不过多描述了，总结，嫩妹还有服务，值得check
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：小婉 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：9.13 人照评分：8.5 颜值评分：8.8 身材评分：9 服务评分：10 态度评分：10 环境评分：8.5 整体描述：再次见面，老师依然安静温婉，进门主动热情坐着聊了聊天，帮忙拖鞋，洗澡全程不用自己动手，从这里就感觉态度很好，然后开始服务，老师蹲下口，口的很带劲还会主动让我对视。我去，边洗边口边对视真是有感觉，到了房间后老师帮忙擦干脚后对着镜子跪着又开始口，差点没忍住，赶紧让老师做服务，课表上有的都做了。然后给老师做了点前戏，69没异味，女上是真的紧，直接交枪。爱爱姿势配合。回血的时候还能聊天按摩，提供情绪价值，开始第二次，老师的舌头是真的很灵活。口活也不错，直接开干对着镜子站着干，通过镜子能和老师对视没多久又交抢了，爽炸了
【时间】：2026-08-18 【老师】：菲菲 【评价人】：匿名用户 综合评分：8.33 人照评分：8 颜值评分：8 身材评分：8 服务评分：9 态度评分：9 环境评分：8 整体描述：态度好，🐻又大又软。 真人比照片年轻点，中规中矩。 还不错。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xzsndp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 536,570 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“徐州苏宁点评榜” (@xzsndp), 5,412 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xzsndp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.