這個頻道不更新了 大家以後加我這個頻道哦 https://t.me/mv1210mm

Channel
中部選正妹
@xrk26
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,164subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001362199031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xrk26 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xrk26 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 2,164 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 2,169 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 2,175 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 2,186 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 2,196 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 2,205 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 2,208 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.98%
- avg views ÷ 2,164 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 64.5
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.56%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (22 July 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 129 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#臺中約妹 謝謝熊哥來捧場啦 👍👍 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
❤1
昨天深夜 來單了 臺中最後兩個妹妹介紹給哥哥 妹妹剛好要下班了 哥在來晚兩分鐘都不行了 🤣🤣 安安家妹妹凌晨 就會陸續開始下班了 大家約凌晨時間的 要提前2-3小時來預約 不然超過凌晨3點零時來預約 都是看緣分了 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
#臺中推薦 #10000一節 #兩節20000 娜娜 160cm/45kg/B+cup/22歲 小隻馬氣質正妹 短期兼職中 一個人自由自在 人美漂亮 服務騷 熱情主動舔你弟弟 幫你口交 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
❤1
#臺中推薦 #4000一節 #兩節75000 朵華 165-E-50kg-26歲 肌膚緊實自然光滑 全方位的服務很貼心 殘癈澡 喇舌 口交 69 女上位 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
❤1
#臺中 #小歐 #客評 妹妹的地區:臺中 妹妹的名字:小歐 身材密碼: 162 50kg E 25歲 整體得分: 90 回衝指數:90 服務過程:這次見面真的讓我驚艷!照片與本人一致度超高,完全沒有落差,一進門就眼前一亮。她的穿搭風格很會挑選,那種優雅又帶點性感的輕熟女路線,讓人瞬間就有滿滿的期待感。 互動方面真的很舒服,她屬於會主動帶節奏的那種,眼神交流到位,表情管理也自然,從頭到尾都沒有敷衍或死板的感覺。聊天時很會接話,細節上也特別配合,整個過程既放鬆又帶點曖昧的張力,體驗感非常好。下次如果有機會,一定還會再約! 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
❤1
#臺中推薦 #4000一節 #兩節7500 悅悅 162cm D 28歲 人超好聊 性感翹臀 敏感多汁的淫水 讓哥哥超爽 很緊實 很耐操 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
#臺中推薦 #6000一節 #兩節 11000 可馨 165cm D奶 23歲 46kg 大胸部配上纖細的水蛇腰 光滑緊緻的肚皮沒有生過 又純又慾類型~ 皮膚白皙嫩滑 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
#臺中推薦 #10000一節 #兩節20000 小七 158cm.44kg.Ccup.20歲 瓜子小臉.皮膚白皙 超會搖電臀 萌萌噠的夢幻系正妹 肌膚白皙透亮,美膚Q彈,小粉紅色乳頭 整個是大大們的女友人選 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
#臺中推薦 小寧 157.C.44.19歲 #今天第一天下海 粉穴、嫩鮑、水多、緊緻、經驗少、欠調教 😍😍頻道分割綫——————————- 🧚🏿客評不踩雷 🧚🏿北部選正妹 🧚🏿中部選正妹 🧚🏿南部選正妹 🧚🏿安安碎碎唸 🧚🏿安安大本營 🧚🏿休閒放鬆區
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @xrk26. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 332,857 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中部選正妹” (@xrk26), 2,164 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xrk26.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.