Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 小马TG代发工作室通知频道

Channel

小马TG代发工作室通知频道

@xmdftz868

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

3,114subscribers

+2,994 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003590839612
TypeChannel
Username@xmdftz868
Created6 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/xmdftz868

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

863,1181,6027 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers15 August 2026 — 107 subscribers22 August 2026 — 86 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,118 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,117 subscribers25 September 2026 — 3,114 subscribers3,1147 August 202625 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 49 days, net +2,994. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 17:543,114-3
11 Sept 2026, 17:573,117-1
7 Sept 2026, 13:003,118+3,032
22 Aug 2026, 05:4686-21
15 Aug 2026, 11:23107-13
9 Aug 2026, 04:02120no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:33120first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 09:19 UTC140 viewsread 9 August 2026

最近TG在清理长时间不登陆上线的号码,老板们有这样的号码建议近期登陆一下,以防被清退!!!

5 May 2026, 12:04 UTC460 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

CVV行业新增 1845个高净值国外群 CVV行业卖料的老板 快来下单 300U CVV行业中外群组全部推送!!!

24 Apr 2026, 16:59 UTC460 viewsread 9 August 2026

真他妈无语TG疯了之前的号死了 联系这个号 @xmdf868

9 Apr 2026, 10:35 UTC513 viewsread 9 August 2026

代发空出两个套餐原价280U 现在220U一个月 有需要的来

3 Apr 2026, 12:49 UTC527 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

此人跑路狗 大家注意 骗资源的小逼我操你妈的

16 Mar 2026, 06:52 UTC584 viewsread 9 August 2026

我话痨了 这几天遇到两个这样的了 我很生气 首先我不是骗子 全网查我 看看我跑路过 坑过人吗 这样的客户就是在逼我们这种实打实干事的去做骗子 欺人太甚了 当然我不会去做骗人的勾当 但是都互相理解一下可以吗 想二三百块钱就能开单赚大钱的人都是什么心理呢 我不是财神爷 再说了你拿二三百块钱给财神爷上供 人都不一定理你 我太无语了 现在好人太难做了 各位就当吃瓜吧 我再说一次钱=效果 以后不是诚心做的客户 不要联系我了 不想影响心情 互相理解一下

16 Mar 2026, 06:46 UTC566 viewsread 9 August 2026

气的我肝痛 200块钱有咨询 还成交了一个客户 和我说没效果 我真无语了 是200人民币不是200U伙计 我真的影响我心情了 拿多少钱办多少钱的事儿 望各位周知 钱=效果 这样的客户我希望以后他找到的都是骗子 我希望他被坑几次 涨涨脑子

16 Mar 2026, 06:42 UTC532 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

以后这种客户不接待 还有我要更改套餐价格了 测试套餐就是给客户看我不是骗子 广告正常再发的 以后要是想200来块钱人民币就嗷嗷来客户成交 别怪我骂人 大家伙都知道 钱=效果 我想问问各位明事理的 200人民币还不是说没来客户来了一个 还想让我怎么着啊 我成无语了 200块人民币我想问问我能赚多少 我全是利润吗 就算是全是利润我才赚200 我成无语了 以后这样的客户不接待 我不想骂人 都互相理解一下 钱=效果 这句话希望大家都明白 我提供测试套餐就是为了让客户看看我不是骗子广告正常再发 如果都想着200块钱你就能来很多客户开单 你告诉我我也要200的 我最近真无语了

28 Feb 2026, 10:07 UTC565 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

开工开工! 马年找小马代发暴富马上发!!! 小马工作室全体祝大家马年大吉 马上暴富!!! 过完年快来做推广啦 抓住第一波复工福利!!

19 Jan 2026, 07:47 UTC593 viewsread 9 August 2026

出C圈自助卖料机器人 可包月包年包永久 你自己的后台服务器 不会偷卡 有需要的来咨询!

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xmdftz868. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小马TG代发工作室通知频道” (@xmdftz868), 3,114 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmdftz868.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.