Photo, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@xmbm6666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,803subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003770805616 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xmbm6666 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 2 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xmbm6666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 3,803 | +27 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 3,776 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 3,774 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,350 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 87.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.8.x 老师花名:#琳琳 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#集美 上课花费:6p 服务内容:可陪洗,口活很不错,🉑🐍,姿势配合度很棒,聊天舒服,反馈很好易高潮,情绪价值不错,女友感尚可。 颜值身材:颜值中等偏上,妆还行,身材匀称,胸B-,户型不错,草坪毛少,皮肤黄,无纹身,皮肤滑度正常,紧度正常,湿度正常。 人照符合度:7 环境:7 我还是比较介意两个人用一个房间 卫生:9 干净 优点:聊天很舒服 后入易高潮 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定为:嫩妹 说两句:聊天很…
预备役带翅膀:贝贝 尔尔 汤圆 基本上开课的都刷完了,休息两天
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.8.x 老师花名:#暮暮 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#集美 上课花费:6p 服务内容:可陪洗,口活一般,🐍主动配合,姿势配合度不错,聊天舒服,反馈很棒,声音超甜,情绪价值很好,女友感爆棚。 颜值身材:颜值很好看,是我喜欢的类型,非常可爱,妆还可以,身材小小只,胸A+,户型正常,草坪毛多,皮肤白,无纹身,皮肤滑度偏滑,紧度正常,湿度正常。 人照符合度:8 环境:7 我还是比较介意两个人用一个房间 卫生:9 干净 优点:无需多言 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️…
❤3👍1
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.8.x 老师花名:#曼曼 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#湖里 上课花费:5p 服务内容:可陪洗,口活还行,🐍主动配合,姿势配合度很不错,聊天很主动亲切,反馈还可以,情绪价值不错,女友感较高。 颜值身材:颜值中等偏上,妆正常,身材正常,胸B,户型正常,草坪正常,皮肤黄偏白,有纹身,皮肤滑度正常,紧度正常,湿度正常。 人照符合度:7 环境:7 卫生:8 优点:聊天主动亲切 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定为:嫩妹 说两句:很亲切的嫩妹,软硬件都中规中矩,但是聊天过程中能让你感觉非常…
❤3
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.8.x 老师花名:#凤梨酥 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#湖里 上课花费:7p 服务内容:自助洗,口活没试,大蟒蛇,姿势配合度还可以,反馈很棒,情绪价值很棒,女友感正常。 颜值身材:颜值好看,妆容很棒锦上添花,匀称型身材,该瘦瘦该肉肉,胸B~C,户型还可以,草坪正常,皮肤白偏黄,纹身“彭”,皮肤滑度偏滑,紧度偏紧,湿度正常。 人照符合度:9.5 妆容很棒,所以基本上是一模一样 环境:9 卫生:9 优点:课室干净整洁 妆好看 缺点:河南女仆 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ …
❤3👍1
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.8.x 老师花名:#亦霏 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#湖里 上课花费:6p 服务内容:自助洗,口活一般,浅浅🐍,姿势配合度还可以,反馈不太行,情绪价值一般,女友感较低。 颜值身材:颜值中等偏上,无妆,小小只,身材偏瘦,胸B+(从比例来看胸很大),户型不错,草坪毛少,皮肤黄偏白,无纹身,皮肤滑度偏滑,紧度偏紧,湿度偏湿。 人照符合度:7 环境:7 卫生:7 优点:暂无 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定为:自助式充气娃娃嫩妹 说两句:鸡头烟手下的嫩妹,颜值一般,但是身材肤色都很不错的嫩妹,基本上是自助式的充…
❤2
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.7.x 老师花名:#诗宁 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#湖里 上课花费:6p 服务内容:🉑陪洗,口活不错,主动🐍(吻技稍微差点意思,配合度很高,很主动),姿势配合度很好,反馈很棒,情绪价值很好,会发骚,女友感很好。 颜值身材:颜值中等偏上,妆一般般,小小只,身材偏瘦,胸a-,户型不错,草坪毛少,皮肤黄偏白,好像没纹身或者有小块纹身(有点忘了),皮肤滑度适中,紧度偏紧,湿度正常。 人照符合度:8.5 环境:8 卫生:8 优点:女友感很棒 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐⭐ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️⭐⭐ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐⭐ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 白马嫩妹…
❤2
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.7.x 老师花名:#瑶瑶 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#湖里 上课花费:7p 服务内容:陪洗,口活一般般,🉑大蟒🐍(近期以来🐍得最舒服的一个了),姿势配合度还行,反馈还行,情绪价值还可以,女友感还可以,一开始有点闷(有点不知道做什么的呆萌感)后面挑逗了一下就好了。 颜值身材:颜值好看,脸稍微有点婴儿肥,妆一般,笑起来好看,小小只,身材很不错(王林最爱的类型),胸b-,户型还可以,草坪毛不多,皮肤白偏黄,纹身手臂腿上都有,皮肤滑度适中,紧度偏紧,湿度正常。 人照符合度:9 环境:8 卫生:7 优点:舌吻很舒服 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐⭐ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️…
❤3
预备役带翅膀:贝贝 尔尔 汤圆
❤1
白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定报告 鉴定时间:26.7.x 老师花名:#奶思 老师类型:嫩妹 老师年龄:18~20 老师坐标:#思明 上课花费:7p 服务内容:自助洗,口活还不错,🉑🐍(主动🐍好评,但是吻技一般),姿势配合度还行,反馈不错,情绪价值还可以,女友感还可以。 颜值身材:颜值中等偏上,妆一般,身材很不错,匀称型,胸b+,屁股圆乎,户型粉红,草坪毛不多,皮肤黄偏白,皮肤滑度适中,紧度偏紧,湿度偏湿。 人照符合度:8(近期几张蛮像的) 环境:7 卫生:7 优点:主动🐍 缺点:暂无 脸蛋:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 身材:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 皮肤:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 态度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 服务度:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 蟒蛇度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 发烧程度:⭐️⭐️ 单p体验指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 女友感指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 多刷指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 推荐程度:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 性价比:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 白马嫩妹鉴定委员会鉴定为:炮架嫩妹 说两句:两件套嫩妹,…
❤3
乱花渐欲迷人眼,小一个月没咋出击了,各个榜多了这么多嫩妹?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xmbm6666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
2026年第二季度最佳新秀嫩妹投票
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 298,859 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“白马嫩妹鉴定委员会” (@xmbm6666), 3,803 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xmbm6666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.