Channel
@xj2088
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
705subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003538799448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xj2088 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xj2088 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 705 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 690 | +24 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 666 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 666 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 June 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,700 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 88.2% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 11.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌟 老师评价 🌟 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏷️ 1 👤 老师：小敬 (@xj2054) 🔗 主页：https://t.me/wuhanhua1/17188?single ⭐ 综合：★★★★★ 5/5 ├ 🎯 技能：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 💗 情绪：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 🏡 环境：★★★★☆ 4/5 └ 📷 人照：★★★★★ 5/5 📝 评价内容： 进去一看，小敬老师身着一袭粉色连衣裙，极为的养眼，进门递水、帮忙脱鞋，细节直接拉满。 废话不多说直接交了水费洗漱，洗的非常的干净，洗完老师会给我擦干。来到床上老师就开始了表演，先走B面，各种游走极为丝滑，最绝的是会让你双脚紧贴着她的胸口，感受那阵阵心跳。毒龙更是货真价实，不同于敷衍的轻舔，她是真往里顶。转到A面，她用力吮吸乳头，随后一路向下，舔蛋接深喉，足足吞吐了四五次，那股停顿感直冲天灵盖，本来有感觉想忍住的，结果根本忍不住，快速把JJ从老…
我不想一个人过情人节 老公们，约起来吧☺️
开课了😍😍😍
头课约起😍
❤2🤮1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌟 老师评价 🌟 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏷️ 1 👤 老师：小敬 (@xj2054) 🔗 主页：https://t.me/wuhanhua1/17188?single ⭐ 综合：★★★★★ 5/5 ├ 🎯 技能：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 💗 情绪：★★★★★ 5/5 ├ 🏡 环境：★★★★☆ 4/5 └ 📷 人照：★★★★★ 5/5 📝 评价内容： 进门瞬间小敬老师就主动热情拥抱，整个人软软贴过来，身上淡淡体香混合淡雅香水，氛围很好。她直接把人拉到床边坐下，自己跪在面前边撒娇聊天边解衣服，然后拉着我的手一同走进浴室，时不时主动贴上来🐍吻，动作大胆熟练。服务全程与课表一致：口活用心，舌头灵活湿热、技巧到位；毒龙毫无保留，喉咙包裹感强并抬眼看人，情绪价值拉满；胸推时把软弹的胸完全压上来夹着滑动，偶尔用乳尖去蹭；指划细致，力道适中。中间换了多个姿势，全程配合很骚，主动扭腰迎合，下面水多又热，进…
❤1
开课了，宝贝们
❤1🤮1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌟 老师评价 🌟 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏷️ 1 👤 老师：小敬 (@xj2054) 🔗 主页：https://t.me/wuhanhua1/17188?single ⭐ 综合：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 🎯 技能：★★★★☆ 4/5 ├ 💗 情绪：★★★★★ 5/5 ├ 🏡 环境：★★★★☆ 4/5 └ 📷 人照：★★★★★ 5/5 📝 评价内容： 见过老师的报告，感觉应该靠谱，约了时间到达现场，课室环境很好，老师热情周到，让人很放松。服务过程很享受，课表的内容一个不少，只需要享受就可以了。老师的技术很好，总能撩拨到爽点，过程很认真，一点都不敷衍，只要不喊停绝对不会停那种。我是那种不太好意思动手动脚的类型，但是看着老师诱人的身材，最终还是没忍住和老师互动，老师也非常大方的配合，瞬间让我有了继续试探的勇气。胸圆润饱满形状还好看，腰细，小腹一点赘肉都没有，小花园也粉嫩干净无异味，生平第一次尝…
❤1
开课了😍😍😍
bb 痒了😁😁😁有没有来只痒的😜
今晚✌️空😍😍😍
开课了，宝贝们
真毒龙 服务特好 今晚✌️空
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xj2088. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小敬的小家” (@xj2088), 705 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xj2088.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.