今天在的哦

Channel
芯芯的频道
@xinxin129
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,678subscribers
+310 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004444383000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xinxin129 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 17 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xinxin129 |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 1,678 | -33 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 1,711 | -64 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 1,775 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,793 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 1,791 | +17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 1,774 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 1,755 | +21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 1,734 | +46 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 1,688 | +40 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 1,648 | +28 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 1,620 | +133 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,487 | +94 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 1,393 | +25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 1,368 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 56.3% | |
| 💩 | 14 | 43.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
今天开课了哦
❤3
谢谢哥哥们好评
❤3
今天开课了哦
❤1
来大姨妈了 回来见
❤1
芯芯的频道 pinned a photo
菜单在这里 4p 8pp哦
💩7❤3
【花名】#芯芯 【车牌】@xinxin236 【价格】400p 800pp 【验证】 老塞 【硬件】20岁的妹妹,可爱乖乖女,身高166,体重100,胸c,有少量纹身,皮肤中等偏白,全身微微婴儿肥,小号小蝴蝶逼,外侧颜色很浅,掰开后粉嫩,包裹感和褶皱感很强,水特别多 【软件】陪洗、舌吻、口、情趣制服 【体验】和芯芯在一起完全就是甜 甜蜜蜜的恋爱,她很爱笑,少女般甜美的笑容让你如沐春风,不像那些毫无情绪价值的精神小妹,亲人的态度完全就像一只害羞又喜欢撒娇的小猫咪,床上的反馈又像一只风骚的小恶魔 上楼就看到了她,亭亭玉立,看着她,她也看着我,交了水费就过来挽着我,进了房间,洗漱完忍不住就直接亲,亲的时候,舌头直接伸到我的嘴巴里面 上床之后,又忍不住抱着亲吻,她还是太权威了,直接把她按到床上,狂暴大蟒蛇让她先窒息一会再说 直接狂舌了个十几分钟,直到她不能呼吸,将她拉起来,抱着她坐到我的腿上,一起聊了会天 实在是…
❤7💩5
【出击时间】:7月17号 【出击留名】:匿名 【妹子花名】:芯芯 【联系方式】: 【修车水费】:4 【颜值身材】:8 【凶器罩杯】: 【服务详情】: 下班无事,看到老师。问了一下今天还有优惠,约定时间就出发了。上楼老师来接的第一印象就是年轻漂亮的小姐姐。进门交水费,带我洗了澡。满背的纹身第一次见还是挺惊讶的。洗完上床口了一会,准备开始的时候因为有点激动,出了点意外,老师也是温柔鼓励,成功开始游戏。123456789…结束后顺了一瓶水走。 总体来说,性价比非常高的老师,推荐尝试 【总体评分】:9 【总体评价]:9
💩2
Video, posted without a caption
今天优惠1哦
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @xinxin129. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“芯芯的频道” (@xinxin129), 1,678 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xinxin129.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.