Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 司令令(素颜女大)

Channel

司令令(素颜女大)

@xigonggongzhu888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,451subscribers

+430 since we began measuring on 9 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003986447797
TypeChannel
Username@xigonggongzhu888
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 October 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/xigonggongzhu888

Growth

1,0211,4511,2369 October 2026 — 1,021 subscribers13 October 2026 — 1,058 subscribers16 October 2026 — 1,044 subscribers19 October 2026 — 1,046 subscribers22 October 2026 — 1,451 subscribers9 October 202622 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 13 days, net +430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 957–1,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 19:301,451+405
19 Oct 2026, 05:571,046+2
16 Oct 2026, 14:281,044-14
13 Oct 2026, 04:161,058+37
9 Oct 2026, 19:221,021first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 1,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
380
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held20 (8 October 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total6,837
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC182 viewsread 9 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#好评 【优势】身材好白嫩,前凸后翘肉感饱满不胖不瘦 【不足】多点项目就完美了 【出击时间】:10月9日 【老师花名】:#司令令 @kuangye5322221 【出击留名】:棒棒冰 【开课位置】:拱墅小区房 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ 【人照评价】:(从人照相似度9成,戴眼镜小萌妹子) 【身材评价】:(身高和课表一致160左右皮肤嫩白,手感滑溜,萝莉与细枝硕果差不多、没有纹身不抽烟) 【胸部评价】:(罩杯两手握起差不多C+,乳头大一点三点粉) 【鲍鱼评价】:(户形小鲍鱼还是馒头不懂,毛量有点长,水量足,紧度合适) 【服务评价】:服务主动三件套 【态度评价】:(过程无机车,催、赶,无罚站行为等) 【环境评价】:(课室干净,有一次性浴巾等)…

9 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC174 viewsread 9 October 2026

半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】嫩妹 【不足】刚入行,还需要调教 【妹子花名】:#司令令 【联系方式】:@kuangye5322221 【妹子年龄】:19 【验证留名】:@bruc_xx 【验证时间】:10月9日 【大概位置】:拱墅区 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:相似度9分,个人感觉真人更好看 【身高身材】:身高1米6左右,无纹身,正常肤色 【凶器罩杯】:胸B-C,一只手握着刚好,比较软 【湿度紧度】:比比紧,毛量一般 【环境细节】:交通还可以,房间安全,拆迁房整租 【个人卫生】:不抽烟,有漱口水/牙刷/浴巾,事前事后都有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松 【服务点评】:服务到位,过程无机车 【推荐程度】:✅ 差评 中评 中好…

9 Oct 2026, 13:50 UTC199 viewsread 9 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】:#好评 【优势】身材好白嫩,前凸后翘肉感饱满不胖不瘦 【不足】多点项目就完美了 【出击时间】:10月9日 【老师花名】:#司令令 @kuangye5322221 【出击留名】:棒棒冰 【开课位置】:拱墅小区房 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 ✅ ③ 情绪价值 ✅ 【人照评价】:(从人照相似度9成,戴眼镜小萌妹子) 【身材评价】:(身高和课表一致160左右皮肤嫩白,手感滑溜,萝莉与细枝硕果差不多、没有纹身不抽烟) 【胸部评价】:(罩杯两手握起差不多C+,乳头大一点三点粉) 【鲍鱼评价】:(户形小鲍鱼还是馒头不懂,毛量有点长,水量足,紧度合适) 【服务评价】:服务主动三件套 【态度评价】:(过程无机车,催、赶,无罚站行为等) 【环境评价】:(课室干净,有一次性浴巾等)…

9 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC241 viewsread 9 October 2026
Photo

🎁 司令令半价赏金福利 元宝抽奖(定时开奖) ├开奖时间: 2026-10-11 15:00 ├参与需加入: │⭐ 杭州修车协会 │└消耗元宝: 10 │🎫 司令令(素颜女大) │🎫 杭州修车协会抽奖公告 ├奖品列表: ├单P半价优惠券 × 1 ├18赏金 × 1 ├加成上限: 20次 ├抽奖说明:刷屏、灌水、纯表情、复制粘贴、无意义对话、撤回内容等,一律视为无效发言,不计入统计!请用心交流。 开奖如果不在群内,一律视为自动放弃,奖品将会回到奖池继续抽奖活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有。 24小时内预约时间,3天内出击,过时自动作废 中奖需本人出击,转让需经过老师同意并与管理协商,不得私下买卖,出现买卖双方都将被踢出群里!出击完成后提交报告(提交报告额外奖励元宝)如若不提交,将永久拉黑! 喜欢的再抽,抽中的请珍惜。愿每一次抽奖,都是一次心动的选择。 老师:@kuangye5322221 ├发奖人员:司令令 新买…

9 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC286 viewsread 9 October 2026

我在杭州同学会上榜啦! 老师免费上榜,海量六折工兵 群内大量现金红包,报销券等你来抽! https://t.me/Hz_txh

9 Oct 2026, 10:27 UTC329 viewsread 9 October 2026

我在杭州御女阁免费上榜啦,群内氛围轻松,不强制做活动,永久上榜! 👑👑认准Telegram官方认证防伪标志 👑 超多好看的小姐姐都在这里上榜!💖💖💖 https://t.me/hangzhou_777

9 Oct 2026, 09:53 UTC350 viewsread 9 October 2026

杭州嫩妹馆报告:https://telegram.me/hznmg23 【推荐程度】: #好评 【优势】嫩妹,态度热情,情绪价值高 【出击时间】:10月9日 【老师花名】:#司令令(@kuangye5322221) 【出击留名】:guhh 【开课位置】:拱墅 【修车水费】:工兵400p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 69舔逼 (个人不喜欢没问) ③ 情绪价值 ✅ ④ 毒龙 (个人不喜欢没问) 【人照评价】:照片还没本人好看 【身材评价】:有肉的萌妹,一点也不胖,刚刚好 【胸部评价】:b-c 天生丽质 【鲍鱼评价】:嫩,水多 【服务评价】:全 【态度评价】:(不机车,不催、不赶,无罚站行为等) 【环境评价】:课堂干净,有一次性换洗 【过程描述】: #流程细节:无聊打开纸飞机一看,好家伙,嫩妹馆又上新了,一看杭州读书的大一妹子,刚刚接单,OK,马上去。现场到了之后,好家…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xigonggongzhu888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“司令令(素颜女大)” (@xigonggongzhu888), 1,451 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xigonggongzhu888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.