⭐ 很多哥哥不知道加入賬號怎麼表達❓自己想要 這邊貓貓特別講解一下需要告知的點有哪些會更方便推薦哦⭐ 例子: 喜歡類型:155-160 23歲以下 可愛的 B奶以上 大概預算:20k預算希望兩節 希望服務:無套吹 禁止雷點:不要肥老醜 預約時間:2/14 15-17 所在地點:台北 以上 都是需要告知的 這樣我們才能更好的給你推薦你預算範圍內的妹妹哦 👍👍

Channel
喝茶小課堂(全文字)認真看哦
@xiaoketang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,457subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001225222985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaoketang |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaoketang |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 2,457 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 2,467 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 2,471 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 2,475 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 2,477 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 2,478 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 2,477 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 2,477 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐貓貓茶屋|Gleezy總整理⭐ 【請加入Gleezy群組看更多資料】 ⭐全台資訊:https://c.gleezy.top/dNeinjHt ⭐北部資訊:https://c.gleezy.top/BB11 ⭐中部資訊:https://c.gleezy.top/ZB11 ⭐南部資訊:https://c.gleezy.top/NB11 ⭐熟女資訊:https://c.gleezy.top/SN11 ⭐新手必看:https://t.gleezy.top/FmZL40CA ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 名單每日更新 歡迎隨時查看最新資訊 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 貓貓茶屋論壇官網 ▶️ https://www.brusket.com
最近發現一件事,很多第一次找我的客人,好像都把我的定位搞錯了。 很多人以為總機就是一直推妹妹、一直塞名單,不管適不適合,只要能成交就好。 但如果我是這樣做,對我來說反而最累。 你可以換個角度想。 如果我今天硬推一個你根本沒興趣的人,你不會消費,我也一樣賺不到錢。 所以我有什麼理由亂安排、亂推薦? 對我來說,最快、最有效率的方式,就是一開始就幫你找到真正適合你的選擇。 你告訴我你的預算、喜歡的類型、外型、年紀、身高、罩杯,甚至有哪些細節特別在意,我再依照你的需求去推薦適合的人。 很多跟我合作比較久的客人,後來甚至只會跟我說一句: 「今天預算多少,你直接幫我安排。」 因為他們知道,我不會隨便塞人給他。 當然,我也能理解第一次找我的客人,多少都會擔心像在開盲盒,怕踩雷、怕花了錢卻沒有符合期待。 所以如果你願意相信我,我也可以直接幫你安排。 如果你今天的預算內,剛好有我覺得很不錯、也符合你需求的人,我就直接推薦給你。 如果沒有,…
Posted without readable text
為什麽推薦使用Gleezy? 因為他非常的簡潔並且很隱私 簡潔到什麽程度呢? (功能不多其實可以說很少功能,沒有花里胡哨的東西 就是一個很純粹的聊天軟件) 隱私到什麽程度呢? (他這個應用裏面有一個隱私模式在無障礙裏面打開就會變成一個計算器,只有輸對了密碼才能打開,這完美的避免了朋友用你手機看東西誤點到不該看的地方!我之前就是被朋友點到不該看的東西超社死的QQ,親身體驗!) PS:其實我蠻喜歡TG這花里胡哨很多功能貼圖很多玩法的>< 但是沒辦法嗚嗚嗚 只能用新APP了! 這個可以直接在應用商城搜索Gleezy下載 下載了別忘記了加我唷 我的ID:ma8586
喝茶小課堂(全文字)認真看哦 pinned a photo
TG 最近真的太不穩定,而且詐騙帳號也越來越多了。 建議可以直接加我的 Gleezy 或 LINE 備用聯絡,避免失聯~ Gleezy:ma8586 https://p.gleezy.top/YyvfAHhn 備用 Gleezy ②: https://p.gleezy.top/Q6Dx2ATN LINE:4428166 https://line.me/ti/p/Uu_hhwZbW2 備用 LINE ②: https://line.me/ti/p/-AvmCD5S4U 有任何問題、預約需求或找不到 TG,都可以直接透過以上方式聯繫我。
還把我封鎖了呵呵
🚨【詐騙公告|請大家務必提高警覺】🚨 這個不是我的帳號,請勿相信、請勿聯絡! 近期有詐騙集團冒用我的名稱與資料,故意在帳號名稱後面加上【主】等容易讓人誤認的字眼,並使用只差一個字的 ID、相同頭像、甚至一模一樣的個人簡介,冒充官方帳號進行詐騙。 很多客人第一眼看過去會以為是同一個人,因此請大家務必仔細確認帳號資訊,不要因為名稱相似就直接相信。 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ 請記住以下幾點: ❌ 任何要求先付定金、訂金、保證金的,都是詐騙 ❌ 任何要求先轉帳、先匯款的,都是詐騙 ❌ 任何要求轉 U(USDT)、購買點數的,都是詐騙 ❌ 任何以驗證身份、保留名額、開通權限、排隊費、保密金等理由要求提前付款的,都是詐騙 ❌ 沒見到女生之前,任何形式的付款要求都是詐騙 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ 我們全程採用見面付款 ✅ 只收現金,不收轉帳、不收匯款、不收 U ✅ 由您親自確認女生後再付款 ✅ 沒見到女…
❤1
𝐏𝐥𝐨𝐠|七月首輯:發財被愛🧩 希望我的客人 : 股票大漲 工作順利 財力暴增 找我約妹 一切順利
台中地區服務時間新升級 3500-4000價位女生從原本的40分鐘升級為50分鐘1S咯
❤2
關於論壇如何查找搜索自己想要的價位 想要的類型 可以看下以上操作~~ 官網論壇:https://www.brusket.com/
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xiaoketang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 332,813 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“喝茶小課堂(全文字)認真看哦” (@xiaoketang), 2,457 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaoketang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.