#大阪新妹上新 #店長主推 #享8月份福利 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:1870 類型:服裝代言人來勒 身材:163cm/Ecup/22y/43kg 特點介紹: 青春年華帶有獨特的時尚氣場,非常適合喜歡高顏值~有禦姐或網紅明星感的大大 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)

Channel
東京🟢翡翠級(上選逸品)花蜜閣🌸
@xiaobxiaonini
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,135subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002344884077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaobxiaonini |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaobxiaonini |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 1,135 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,133 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,134 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 1,137 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 1,136 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 1,133 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.24%
- avg views ÷ 1,135 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.8
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 294 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#東京新妹上新 #店長主推 #享8月份福利 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4292 類型:秘書模特 身材:168cm/Dcup/22y/44kg 特點介紹: 模特級高挑身形,秘書專業的制服誘惑,22歲青春與幹練並存的矛盾魅力如果你是制服控、喜歡高挑骨感型、想要體驗把職場女神帶回家的幻想,這位店長主推的秘書模特不會讓你失望 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹上新 #店長主推 #月初試車價 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4285 類型:隱藏清純校花 身材:153cm/Ccup/18y/43kg 特點介紹: 站在你面前大概只到你胸口的位置,抬頭看你的那個角度,會讓你的保護慾瞬間爆棚。43公斤的體重讓你完全可以單手把她抱起、放在床上的任何位置,各種體位都可以解鎖 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹上新 #店長主推 #月初特價 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4279 類型:清純大學生 身材:153cm/Dcup/20y/43kg 特點介紹: 清純外表下藏著狂野靈魂 ,CP值直接拉到滿分 完全是本月的必約名單! 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹上新 #店長主推 #月初特價 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4278 類型:廣播電台 身材:155cm/Ecup/25y/46kg 特點介紹: 電台女聲・聽過就忘不了的聲音 現役廣播電台的工作人員不是那種只露臉的主播,而是用聲音抓住聽眾耳朵的那種女人她的嗓音帶點微微的沙啞感,說話的時候語速不快不慢,尾音會輕輕上揚,聽她講話本身就是一種聽覺享受你會在腦中想像她的長相,實際見到後才發現本人比聲音更犯規 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹出勤中 #試車價小時 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4270 類型:大阪國際名模 身材:167cm/Ecup/24y/50kg 特點介紹: 走進房間像雜誌封面走出來的人,高挑纖細但Fcup非常搶眼氣質很好,從頭髮到指甲都是精心打理過的,講話得體有教養 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹上新 #最新出勤中 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4266 類型:日記網紅 身材:155cm/Gcup/20y/47kg 特點介紹: 肌膚的彈性、光澤、緊實度都在最巔峰加上她體型纖細,全身皮膚光滑細嫩,摸起來像嬰兒一樣柔軟這個年紀的女孩身體還沒有經歷太多歲月的痕跡,每一寸都是新鮮的緊實的充滿生命力的 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
#東京新妹上新 #月底買一送一 #最新出勤中 價位:🟢翡翠級 番號:4253 類型:展場一模 身材:168cm/Dcup/23y/44kg 特點介紹: 高挑美腿,讓你享受滿滿 女友fu感強,滿足你所有的喜好 🥰聯絡奈野子: ⭐:jpjtxn 📱:@j1542p 📱:tp1154 📱:@txiaonyz (相遇即是緣,靠譜的性福在眼前)
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @xiaobxiaonini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 779,096 of 1,585,759entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“東京🟢翡翠級(上選逸品)花蜜閣🌸” (@xiaobxiaonini), 1,135 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaobxiaonini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.