Channel
@xiaobei335
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,193subscribers
+1,104 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003944625690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaobei335 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaobei335 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 2,193 | +59 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 2,134 | +81 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 2,053 | +69 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 1,984 | +61 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 1,923 | +117 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 1,806 | +110 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 1,696 | +607 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 1,089 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (22 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,576 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 93.8% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 庆祝8000人活动抽奖 📮 参与条件： 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-小北碎碎念 🎫 加入-西安地陪 🎫 加入-『出击之路』西安 🎫 加入-『狼友闲谈馆』西安 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 52 条 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 128🧧（二二赞助） × 2 💰️ 1🧧（小丑安慰奖） × 1 💰️ 20🧧（天宇赞助） × 10 💰️ 52🧧（天宇赞助） × 5 💰️ 88🧧（小北赞助） × 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： ⭐本次抽奖是哥布林族长卖臀赛脸要来的，兑奖直接咸鱼代发口令红包。 ⭐为了防止机器人、活死人等，将福利真正落实给兄弟们。兑奖前会核实以下情况： 1、直接搜索以往聊天内容，查看是不是小号为了水而水（平时不见人，抽奖发废话刷屏） 2、必须给自己添加了群后缀（成员标签） ⭐否则不予兑奖，取消的🧧会以口令的形式直接发送到群里。 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年08月15日 22时08分00秒
又发现一个好货 🥰🥰🥰🥰 老师🆔：@chacha52 开六夯到爆，等车评！！！
兄弟们，最近有人冒充小北进行诈骗，还请大家不要相信，小北不会出于任何目的任何需求和大家借钱，请大家不要被骗，被骗与本人无关！！！🥰🥰🥰
等俺🥰🥰🥰老师🆔：@chacha52
大家好！这里是小北碎碎念（本人真实出击，车评仅供参考！） 🥰🥰🥰 💎【小小欣】500p/88pp @xxx0070306 🥰🥰🥰🥰 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✨ 颜值： 8.5 👉 简评：人照基本一致，妹子颜值便素颜一点，有一种邻家小妹的感觉。 🧠 性格： 9 👉 简评： 属于是比较文静的妹妹，熟悉之后，就会变的十分开朗。需要主动找话题聊天 💬 态度： 9 👉 简评：由于下雨来晚了一些，遥控上楼后，全程无玩手机的情况。属于慢热型。不催人 💃 身材： 9 👉 简评：160/90左右，小小的一只。正常黄皮，身材比例很好，有胸，皮肤状态还可以。手臂略有纹身是一朵玫瑰花 🎯 罩杯： B 👉 简评：🐻大概是在B左右，比较敏感。胸部比较挺，乳头内陷，色素沉淀比较轻。 🎯 口活：9 👉简评：口活无齿感，不说停是不会停的那种。 🎯 昆感：9 👉 简评：毛发量正常，水量大，轻轻一摸都是水，比较敏感。包裹感比较强。 …
❤2
来喽来喽😈😈😈 老师id：@dudu20080520 感谢子欣姐的老师资源👅👅👅 感谢仙女阁工兵机会👅👅👅 工兵出击🥰 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✨ 颜值： 9 👉 简评：照片有点美颜和磨皮，妹妹本人还是很可以的，鼻子处有一处小小疤痕，不是很明显，侧脸很不错 🧠 性格： 9 👉 简评： 属于是比较文静的妹妹，熟悉之后，就会变的十分开朗和健谈，还有点搞笑存在。 💬 态度： 9.5 👉 简评：由于下雨来晚了一些，遥控上楼后，妹妹全程没有出现玩手机的情况，并且主动给我换拖鞋，帮我放雨伞，十分的贴心。态度十分的热情。 💃 身材： 9 👉 简评：165/90左右，正常黄皮，身材比例很好，有胸，皮肤状态还可以。 🎯 罩杯： B 👉 简评：🐻大概是在B左右，比较敏感。胸部比较挺，乳头内陷，色素沉淀大。 🎯 口活：9 👉简评：口活无齿感，不说停是不会停的那种，另外妹妹也是十分听话，属于是可调教类型，另教学一波口活 …
大家好！这里是小北碎碎念（本人真实出击，车评仅供参考！） 💎【巫灵儿】500p/900pp @wulinger5lr ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✨ 颜值： 7 👉 简评：照片有点美颜和磨皮，妹妹是云南妹子，皮肤偏黑（可能受紫外线影响） 🧠 性格： 9 👉 简评： 大大咧咧的性格，非常的健谈，相处起来比较轻松，适合i人。还会有一点小小的抽象，是一位很逗的云南妹子。 💬 态度： 9.5 👉 简评：遥控上楼后，进门就递来一根烟和饮料，妹妹全程没有出现玩手机的情况，并且在床上态度配合，各种姿势也是十分配合。没有一点催人或者不耐烦的情况，结束之后也是依旧十分热情 💃 身材： 8.5 👉 简评：165/105最右，背部有一些痘痘。黄皮偏黑。有臀波后入视角还不错 🎯 罩杯： B➕ 👉 简评：🐻大概是在B左右，比较敏感。胸部有些下垂。传教视角不错。十分的柔软。乳头偏黑 🎯 口活：9.5 👉简评：有舌钉！！！口活无齿感，…
❤3
放松放松👅👅👅👅
等我👅👅👅👅（不让我去🤡）
大家好！这里是小北碎碎念（本人真实出击，车评仅供参考！）👅👅👅👅👅 💎【耳朵】600p/12pp @zhaoz367 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✨ 颜值： 7 👉 简评：照片有点美颜和磨皮，真人更偏向于路人，并不是颜值车 🧠 性格： 9 👉 简评： 大大咧咧的性格，非常的健谈，相处起来比较轻松，适合i人 💬 态度： 9.5 👉 简评：遥控上楼后，进门就递来一根烟，妹妹全程没有出现玩手机的情况，并且在床上态度配合，没有一点催人或者不耐烦的情况 💃 身材： 7.5 👉 简评：165/100最右，背部有一些痘痘。正常的黄皮。有臀波后入视角拉满。 🎯 罩杯： B 👉 简评：🐻大概是在B左右，比较敏感。胸部有些下垂。传教视角不错。 🎯 口活：9.5 👉简评：口活无齿感，特别的夯，算是独门秘技，口的时候会用舌头对龟头进行舔，给人一种很爽的感觉，特别的刺激，小北差点没顶住！！！（这是第一次有这种感受）真的十分推荐这…
❤3👍1
八仙！八仙！
💎【反向车评之小北】 @beibei_bei ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✨ 颜值： 中等偏上 年轻 👉 简评：长相可以 眼睛很好看 双眼皮 🧠 性格： 特别友好 总夸我好看哈哈 我都不好意思了 👉 简评：表里如一的性格 哈哈哈很活泼 交流不费劲 也不会色眯眯的让人不适 💬 态度： 👍 👉 简评：态度这块小北老师能聊得来 不会很高傲之类 💃 身材： 五五比列 👉 简评：身材中等吧 正常 算不上健身的身材 也许是小北遗憾之一 🎯 牛子 ： 又粗又大 👉 简评： 龟头很饱满 我很喜欢 不像是那种尖尖龟头 做起来让人不适 圆润的龟头总是尝起来软软的 哈哈哈 💖 床感： 床感 8.7分 👉 简评：床上功夫有点意思 唯一一点 时间会有点久 会让人感觉有点桩～ 🏆 综合评价： 9分 👉 总结：整体不错 🔥推荐指数：⭐⭐⭐⭐ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xiaobei335. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 419,053 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小北碎碎念” (@xiaobei335), 2,193 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaobei335.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.