Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 厦门公开榜(验证)

Channel

厦门公开榜(验证)

@xiamenzo

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

19,421subscribers

-88 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002790942496
TypeChannel
Username@xiamenzo
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 November 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/xiamenzo

Growth

19,42119,50919,4653 November 2026 — 19,509 subscribers3 November 2026 — 19,509 subscribers4 November 2026 — 19,494 subscribers5 November 2026 — 19,508 subscribers7 November 2026 — 19,421 subscribers3 November 20267 November 2026
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net -88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,408–19,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:4019,421-87
5 Nov 2026, 04:0519,508+14
4 Nov 2026, 04:5719,494-15
3 Nov 2026, 07:3919,509no change
3 Nov 2026, 04:2019,509first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 19,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.036%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held6 (9 August 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total6,000
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC≈2,790 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

#厦门思明区00后94 会所 🫦🥰真空半裸🥰抓龙筋 原价⚡️⚡️⚡️💸 海选➕海选 全场活动价:⚡️⚡️⚡️💸好评反50 95提前联系客服咨询 不充值 不办卡 一次性消费 没任何隐形消费 ⚡️⚡️🤣钟😱🤣😤😱🔥 🉑上门 🉑到店 需要素的也可以预约 制服诱惑🔥🔥🔥护士👀学生 📱秘书十几种制服可挑选 SPA按摩🫴半裸🌈足交🫰漫游🍀胸推🍀搓澡🍀帮洗澡🧼臀推 胸滑🎆指划🎊调情💕鼻吸🌸乳胶 降落🎆躺抱🎊舌吻🐶环抱🍀毒🐉 🧸全场🥰🥰后 高品质🥰颜值保障🥰 楼下方便停车可过夜。 营业时间🥰🥰小时 厦门第🥇📱📱小🐻 预约⚡️客服:@xiaoxiong5202 双向机器人:@xxhs1_bot 双向联系:15302885141同📱 地址:厦门思明区

❤1

12 Oct 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,210 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🥰🥰标准😃😃服务,漫游、指滑 、口报🥰、过水💦、调情、毒🐉、等,全程裸身服务,专注最优质的 SPA 体验服务😌😌 课时费:5️⃣5️⃣0️⃣服务5/60分钟 (如果有特殊要求,需提早跟客服沟通,(套餐不包出毕竟每个人体质不同) #厦门 🈲醉酒素质低下🈲暴力扣逼 🈲皮肤传染病 🈲吃药 开课时间:下午 2点--凌晨 1点 教室场所: 蔡塘湖景(东1门) 优质培训师:6位在岗(技师实际信息以当天更新为准)💗💗 厦门本色 #厦门口爆天花板 #95 #莞式 #好玩 #👄爆 #SPA #天花板 莞式顶级服务天花板 🥰 ✈️✈️:@bb55311 🤖🤖:@nao5201bot 频道:@nao6655

19 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC≈7,610 views1 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

【妹子花名】: #点点 【所在位置】: #思明区 【上课费用】:800/1p 【服务类别】:全套 【联系方式】: @mmll5888 😃😄😁😆🤣🥰😜😩🤪 ⬇️评论区报告鉴赏⬇️

❤1

10 Sept 2026, 17:59 UTC≈5,610 viewsread 7 November 2026

. 👇下面各城市互推资源👇 1.个人老师免费推广 2.白嫖卷、优惠券,红包各种活动等你

25 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

【妹子花名】: #温柔雨 【所在位置】: #湖里区 【上课费用】: 700/1p 【服务类别】: 全套 【联系方式】:@mmll5888 😃😄😁😆🤣🥰😜😩🤪 ⬇️评论区报告鉴赏⬇️

9 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC≈13,100 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

【妹子花名】: #小奶兔 【所在位置】: #湖里区 【上课费用】: 700/1p 【服务类别】: 全套 【联系方式】: @xmxntbb 😃😄😁😆🤣🥰😜😩🤪 ⬇️评论区报告鉴赏⬇️

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xiamenzo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @xiamenzo as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“厦门公开榜(验证)” (@xiamenzo), 19,421 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiamenzo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.