Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 新开公群 @xbxkq

Channel

新开公群 @xbxkq

@xbxkq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78,387subscribers

+5,566 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002258975821
TypeChannel
Username@xbxkq
Description公群导航 @xbqqg 备用 @xbgq 供需频道 @xbrgx 备用 @xbbh 官方大群 @xbbda 备用 @xbqn 防骗指南 @xbfpx 公告频道 @XINBlKEFU
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xbxkq

Growth

72,79278,63675,71414 August 2026 — 72,821 subscribers15 August 2026 — 72,792 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,636 subscribers17 August 2026 — 78,387 subscribers78,38714 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +5,566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,915–79,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:0778,387-249
16 Aug 2026, 17:5778,636+5,844
15 Aug 2026, 06:1972,792-29
14 Aug 2026, 19:1672,821first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.44%
avg views ÷ 78,387 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held24 (22 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total64,655
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
192

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC795 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群G小组115-供押28666U黑天鹅工作室接码实名微信/QQ/抖音/手机卡/支付宝/小红书公群 https://t.me/+Wy7Tcwx3UqM4OTY1

15 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群G小组556-供押66666U贾氏集团奢侈品银元虫草包回收 https://t.me/+qD4J4uv9D3xiNjA1

15 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群F小组147-供押10000U催收/换汇杀/助贷/百家乐/全行业数据 https://t.me/+0SRgDfqnzvkxNmY0

15 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群K小组9996-供押139888U大白集团京东小时达手机回U https://t.me/+VP_OHSPZDOYyNzY0

13 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群K小组1010-供押7万U乘风支付-招小额码 色播料代收 https://t.me/+vYDBCbtz-GVmMTEx

11 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群K小组370-供押60000U运桔通讯/微信/支付宝/抖音 手机号 https://t.me/+YoXb-RUzjW45Zjk0

11 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群G小组899-供押60万U帕梅一手渠道查档公群(精准天眼) https://t.me/+IxSFdrUXPig3OTQ1

11 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群F小组575-供押19000U财神号商/接码 https://t.me/+5HV53gu6A-FhZjBk

9 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群G小组818-供押11万U大壮白资收U出U保永久司法/承兑公群 https://t.me/+_gnONDgwbjoyMWE1

9 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群F小组605-供押18万U海绵集团一二道卡码接回u支付宝微信丝滑入金 https://t.me/+Az0lm1ZYm0FiOWVk

7 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群F小组578-供押6000U天天全国二道承兑面交/全压 https://t.me/+vULYzAJS51kzMmU8

7 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 18 August 2026

公群K小组2023-供押30000U大白集团白资收U/全国送现 https://t.me/+PPHxTdeMGvA1MTIx

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @xbxkq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,067,518 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“新开公群 @xbxkq” (@xbxkq), 78,387 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xbxkq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.