Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

西安 | 洗浴会所 | 官方频道

@xa821

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,093subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441291980
TypeChannel
Username@xa821
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xa821

Growth

4,0934,0994,0967 August 2026 — 4,096 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,096 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,099 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,093 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,092–4,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:064,093-6
7 Aug 2026, 23:094,099+3
7 Aug 2026, 08:314,096no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:254,096first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.20%
avg views ÷ 4,093 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held10 (28 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total852
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC189 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @xa961

西安全城·丝足KB,95小活推荐集合【排名不分先后·不办卡不充值无强制消费】 莲湖区丰庆路【蜜桃Spa】 南郊长安路西路【轻语Spa】 未央区北郊凤二【相依Spa】 【获取位置接待点联系客服·出发前核实状态】 工作时间:下午13:00-凌晨3:00(秒回消息)

1 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC185 viewsread 8 August 2026

❤️西安 低端会所推荐6月❤️ ❶未央区北郊: 👉凤城四路山海598/798元 👉北二环白雪→598/798元 👉未央路金澜→598/798元 👉凤城四路山海→598/798元 👉高陵马家湾→698/898元 👉东郊青龙路(唐朝)598/798 ❷钟楼附近: 👉北大街(清水阁)598/798 ❸雁塔区西郊南郊高新: 👉太白南路西荷598/798元 👉朱雀大街金陵598/798元 👉长安西路醉美598/798元 👉南郊华城国际名流 598/798 👉三桥柏林(玲珑)598/798 ❹咸阳/宝鸡市→会所门店推荐 渭滨区西秦 →598/798 渭滨区仙境 →598/798 渭滨区金沙 →598/798 咸阳银河→698/898 咸阳白云→698/898 咸阳钻石→698/898

1 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026

❤️甄选 中高端会所推荐如下❤️ 钟楼附近: 👉西门外西关情景998/1398元 👉北大街北关情景998/1398元 👉红庙坡老城根情景998/1398元 未央区北郊: 👉北二环高端2000元 👉北郊凤城九路高端顶奢 👉北二环地海情景998/1398元 雁塔区南郊高新: 👉朱雀大街大唐1298/1698元 👉朱雀大街青舍998/1398元 👉南郊长丰园电视塔→998/1398元 👉高新大寨路X→998/1398元 更多店面私信客服↓ 预约客服:点击此处→预约

25 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC313 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

关注古城西安频道不迷路 👉 ❤️外卖特色🐍稳专场,零经验,各种学生兼职云集,洗浴,半套SAP 应有尽有!欢迎咨询,预约! 预约点击客服,切勿上当受骗。 每日更新🆕点击下方链接查看

6 Jul 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️⚠️⚠️ 切勿相信群内客服以外人员,所有私聊你的都是骗子,本群客服不会私聊任何人。切勿上当

4 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC830 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#未央区 #北郊 #北二环 #高端 3000 80分两次 ®畅享丝袜诱惑高跟魅力火力输出 预约客服 https://t.me/xa801

4 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC751 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#北郊→凤城九路高端顶奢 #高端 位置:纳家楼如意·禧苑国力仁和 轻奢:2900(70分钟一次) 顶奢:3500(90分钟两次) 本店女孩分项目不分牌 预约客服:点击此处→预约

28 Jun 2026, 06:27 UTC835 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#南郊→长丰园海选【南庭】 位置:锦福包子·锦福砂锅(长丰园店) 项目1:998(60分钟全套一次) 项目2:1398(80分钟无限次) 项目3:1598(90分钟无限次➕情景) 选配:➕300小双飞 预约客服:点击此处→预约

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @xa821. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,583 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“西安 | 洗浴会所 | 官方频道” (@xa821), 4,093 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xa821.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.