Gaming β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
106,000 average views per post against 75,680 subscribers β an engagement rate of 139.6%. Across the 3,271 registered channels in the same cohort β 31,626β99,967 subscribers, posting mainly in English β the middle half sit between 1.83% and 11.9%, with a median of 5.27%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (19 July 2026 β 18 August 2026)
Posts measured
22 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 22 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
2,324,800
Mature posts only
139.6% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Β±0.041% of the figure, from Telegramβs rounding
Post language
English Β· 100.0%of the windowβs posts
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3Γ away from that cohortβs median β above it β on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes β audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelβs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +15,532. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 57,916β78,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 08:42
75,778
+98
17 Aug 2026, 09:47
75,680
+555
15 Aug 2026, 19:06
75,125
+393
14 Aug 2026, 07:37
74,732
+731
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
74,001
+1,832
11 Aug 2026, 23:55
72,169
+1,558
10 Aug 2026, 23:31
70,611
+2,049
10 Aug 2026, 00:02
68,562
+4,758
8 Aug 2026, 20:53
63,804
+3,558
8 Aug 2026, 11:50
60,246
no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:49
60,246
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 21 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
139.5%
avg views Γ· 75,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
106,000
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.943%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
25 (1 August 2026 β 15 August 2026)
Views total
2,324,800
Reactions total
21,913
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 52s
Average length
2m 56s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
21,913 reactions across 22 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 21,913reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ReLiCπ«₯ pinned Β«Here is the tutorial video of the commentary π£ π₯Video link https://youtu.be/PTV1ya_jnBw?si=BT-fHzPZz26hXheE. π€Channel Link https://youtube.com/@relicpes?si=aUBKzRe682EL2pv4 Thanks everybody, follow the instructions.Β»
Here is the tutorial video of the commentary π£
π₯Video link
https://youtu.be/PTV1ya_jnBw?si=BT-fHzPZz26hXheE.
π€Channel Link
https://youtube.com/@relicpes?si=aUBKzRe682EL2pv4
Thanks everybody, follow the instructions.
This version is The jp.konami.pesam
Not millionaire, if u have the obb jp.konami.pesam then just update the apk.
And the commentary download the file i posted and put it where it belongs, read the instructions.
I will post tutorial video later today. I'm doing my own things, you can get upset or cry not my problem. You either wait me or follow the instructions.
I don't have a time to do this as i said everybody
Hey everyone, has anyone worked on the commentary?
If someone already has, please help other people.
I don't have time to do these things. I'm dealing with my own life.
Thanks
ποΈ English Commentary Download & Setup
The English commentary is working. β
You just need to download it, extract it, and place the commentary file in the correct location.
π₯ Download
English Commentary:
https://www.mediafire.com/file/zrb5sd9bilm7830/EN_Special-Commentary.rar/file?dkey=6c8ybw2911c&r=1258
π Where to Put It
1. π₯ Download EN_Special-Commentary.rar
2. π¦ Extract the ".rar" file using ZArchiver, RAR, β¦
β½ PES 2021 Mobile β Current Progress & Important Notes
Hereβs the updated list of what is currently completed and working, plus a few important things everyone should know before playing. π
β Completed & Working
- π§ 4-2-4 Formation β added and working properly
- π₯ Team Spirit β working correctly
- π₯ Player Familiarity β working
- β οΈ Important: If you already have existing game data and an older squad from theβ¦
π’ RELIC β RELEASE DATE ANNOUNCEMENT
First of all, thank you to everyone for all the support, patience, feedback, and suggestions. β€οΈ
A lot of work has gone into the upcoming release, and several major systems and issues have now been completed.
β Completed
- ποΈ Commentary
- β½ Player Familiarity
- π§ Coach Familiarity
- π₯ Team Spirit
- π₯ Multiple Squads
- π Scouts
- π° Auction
- π Achievements
- π οΈ Various bugs and β¦
π’ Quick News
Everything is almost done. Iβm just wrapping up the final things now.
ποΈ Commentary is also being added, as many of you requested.
Just to be clear, this is not the update yet, just some news to let you know where things are at. Weβre getting very close. β€οΈ
Also, please stop DMing me with questions for now. There are way too many messages and I simply canβt respond to everyone individually. If thereββ¦
π’ UPDATE + DISCORD IS NOW OPEN!
Thank you everyone for all the reports so far. β€οΈ
Iβve already collected the main issues you guys reported:
β Cannot create more than one squad
β Team spirit is stuck at 1, making players perform badly
β Need more Special Trainers
β Need more Managers
β Need the 4-2-4 formation
β Need more Iconic Moments, including Neymar
β Device compatibility issues on some phones
These are now onβ¦
π WE JUST HIT 30,000 SUBSCRIBERS! π
Thank you so much to everyone who subscribed to the channel and supported the game. I truly hope you are all enjoying it! β€οΈβ½
Now I need your help.
Please comment below and tell me about any bugs, problems, crashes, or issues you have experienced in this version. I will review everything, fix as many issues as possible, and release a new update next week. π§π²
β οΈ Please do not spβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @x45rl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 973,120 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βReLiCπ«₯β (@x45rl), 75,778 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x45rl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.