【时间】:2026-08-18 【老师】:小月亮 【留名】:黑夜 【频道】:https://t.me/ww886695 【联系方式】@xzzzlbot双向联系我也是自己回复 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:小月亮老师颜值哇塞🤩笑起来暖暖的,甜甜的让人无法自拔。🐻很大又挺粉粉的、黑色蕾丝小内内,洗完让她穿上黑丝袜,全套莞式下来、床上互动特别多情绪价值拉满,口活做的挺好,一点齿感都没有,而且会问怎么舔你比较舒服,有感觉了,让她坐上来的一瞬间,小弟弟像被一团海绵挤压一样真紧,女上很久她也不闲累,换了几个姿势很舒服。妹妹特别乖,什么姿势都配合,下面B紧水多也无比的享受,叫起来真的好听,之后换成后入,老师跪着屁股翘起来,插进去前前后后,太爽了,在一阵阵呻吟中交了货,真的是非常不错的体验,老师非常的有耐心,很温柔,女友感拉🈵,值

Channel
小月亮后花园
@ww886695
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,460subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003592465441 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ww886695 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 3 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ww886695 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,460 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 1,462 | +20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,442 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 1,433 | +10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 1,423 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 89.7%
- avg views ÷ 1,460 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,310
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 May 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,166 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 36s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 96.4% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
@wekk8866 @www58956 飞机✈️ @xzzzlbot 双向联系机器人也是我自己回复哈 Q3698654808 Q3667539822 电话18759121325
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «小月亮后花园»
上课了额宝宝们
名称:小月亮老师 验证留名:神神 双向联系我:@xzzlbot 验证时间:7月24 上课价位:5p8pp 位置:福州晋安区 QQ:3849159069 颜值身材:163 服务内容:全套莞式推油 服务态度:完美环境也好 优点:🐻很大 体验细节: 全面做了一下很舒服爽歪歪,推油更舒服,很会舔,舔的不要不要的,先说,闭着眼睛冲。谁看到就是赚到。宝藏一样,不太想分享给大家😂😂😂 初次见就像老朋友一样,让我感觉很舒服很放松。家里 找她了。谁看到就去吧,保你不后悔👍👍👍非常好非常好
Photo, posted without a caption
开课啦额宝宝们
❤1😁1
名称:小月亮老师 验证留名:@126zfkl 双向联系我:@xzzzlbot 老师频道https://t.me/ww886695 地点:福州晋安区 价格:5p8pp 服务:全套莞式 评分:9 评价:很全面不错 进门依旧性感风、美丽诱人,两个大奶呼之欲出。好久没做,沙发上就直接坐上来,疯狂摩擦我。然后洗澡、依旧是浴室走起,一如既往,感觉老师口活又好了,浴室就已经爽的不行。到床上,换上风骚内衣,又开始,全面AB面、口活是真的顶级,浑身被电的感觉。带上套套,狠狠插入,两个姿势,最后躺下的后入我非常喜欢,老师说她的逼自己在夹我,没忍住,直接缴械。依旧是事后聊天,聊着聊着,又来感觉了,再次👄,插入,这次老师水流成河🤣,又一次在后入姿势中,我全部射了进去,爽!
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ww886695. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 671,539 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小月亮后花园” (@ww886695), 1,460 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ww886695.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.