Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WormGPT - Closed

@wormgptai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,319subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001934649276
TypeChannel
Username@wormgptai
Created16 July 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wormgptai

Growth

2,3192,3232,3217 August 2026 — 2,323 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,322 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,319 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,318–2,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:112,319-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:242,322-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:162,323first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 July 2023the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,543 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28018.1%
🔥26417.1%
👏21513.9%
👍18411.9%
🤩17911.6%
😁1388.94%
🥰1278.23%
🎉1187.65%
👀322.07%
🫡60.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,543reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2023 to 9 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2023, 07:19 UTC≈26,900 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We thought we would also bring this to everyone's attention. Please be careful when connecting your NFT wallets to random websites. Make sure you fully check them out first. A good way to detect if it's a scam site is to open the inspector on the suspected website and if it has the debugger enabled it's highly likely that it's a scam. Also search for words like "drainer" in the sites JS files or "seaport" as these a

13👍10🫡6👀1🤩1

7 Aug 2023, 07:19 UTC≈27,000 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thehackernews

🚨 Attention, everyone! The FBI has issued a warning regarding sneaky cyber crooks who are pretending to be NFT developers. Their intention is to steal your cryptocurrency and digital assets! For more information, please visit: https://thehackernews.com/2023/08/fbi-alert-crypto-scammers-are.html

👀30👍17😁1511🥰4

30 Jul 2023, 14:11 UTC≈24,600 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A reminder for everybody out there please read and be careful there are multiple scammers using WormGPT alias and advising and condoning use for Black Hat activities. These do not align with our values. Thank you.

11👍5

26 Jul 2023, 17:48 UTC≈29,100 views1,419 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ PREVENTING SCAMS In the last few days we've noticed a gigantic increase in people using our WormGPT tools name to pretend they have the tool and trick people into giving their money and then getting nothing. Here are a few tips to help prevent this occurring to you: 1) Ask them to send you a screen recording of them generating some code with your username in the WormGPT tool. 2) Ask them to provide social media

🔥264245👏215🤩178👍152🥰123😁123🎉118

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @wormgptai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WormGPT - Closed” (@wormgptai), 2,319 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wormgptai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.