Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全国8号|高端精品|大圈外围|高质量选妃

Channel

全国8号|高端精品|大圈外围|高质量选妃

@wkaiq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,989subscribers

-1,025 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003679524297
TypeChannel
Username@wkaiq
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/wkaiq

Growth

1,9893,0142,501.510 August 2026 — 3,014 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,014 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,010 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,876 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,619 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,363 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,324 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,217 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,160 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,989 subscribers10 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -1,025. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,835–3,168 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:181,989-171
2 Sept 2026, 04:352,160-57
30 Aug 2026, 01:582,217-107
27 Aug 2026, 11:142,324-39
24 Aug 2026, 07:362,363-139
20 Aug 2026, 17:232,502-117
17 Aug 2026, 16:172,619-257
14 Aug 2026, 07:552,876-134
10 Aug 2026, 21:043,010-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:453,014no change
10 Aug 2026, 16:313,014first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC955 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @wkaimmPhoto

❤️ 全球高质量外围约会俱乐部 😜安排流程😜其他城市 😜联系客服😜双向客服

28 Jun 2026, 06:37 UTC925 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#深圳 真人0整 💗 水灵甜妹|天生冷白皮 🩵 168cm/85斤|06年生 ✨ 无不良嗜好|日常碎片 👉 互动细则看置顶 #清纯学妹 #白皮女孩 #06年女生 #甜美系 📩 联系客服 @waiwei88hao 🤖 双向客服 @waiwei8hao_bot

1

28 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC568 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#青岛 🍓陈漫漫 兔系甜妹69可亲✨ 常年健身·全身紧致白皙嫩滑|制服丝袜·鸳鸯共浴 私定女友感·敏感易湿💦 🌸04年|175cm|90斤|真C胸 👉客服 @waiwei88hao 👉备用 @waiwei8hao_bot

28 Jun 2026, 05:56 UTC435 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#南京 ✨【清纯女友感】✨ 📏身高:170 🎗️胸围:D罩杯 🎂年龄:05年 🚫无纹身 💖童颜玉肌|笑靥甜美|乖巧懂事 🥛肤若凝脂|原生初恋感|本人超赞 🤖约拍/陪伴联系👇 @waiwei88hao @waiwei8hao_bot #清纯 #童颜 #白瘦 #170大长腿 #女友感 #05年

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @wkaiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全国8号|高端精品|大圈外围|高质量选妃” (@wkaiq), 1,989 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wkaiq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.