15 measurements spanning 15 days, net +486. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,456–37,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 09:55
37,015
+45
29 Aug 2026, 10:33
36,970
+73
28 Aug 2026, 09:02
36,897
+42
27 Aug 2026, 07:16
36,855
+35
26 Aug 2026, 09:42
36,820
+17
25 Aug 2026, 10:47
36,803
+36
24 Aug 2026, 09:18
36,767
+25
22 Aug 2026, 15:04
36,742
+80
21 Aug 2026, 05:44
36,662
+13
20 Aug 2026, 06:22
36,649
+54
19 Aug 2026, 04:11
36,595
+10
18 Aug 2026, 06:22
36,585
-16
17 Aug 2026, 09:43
36,601
+50
15 Aug 2026, 18:15
36,551
+22
15 Aug 2026, 02:46
36,529
first reading
Engagement
249 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 37,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,730
249 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.368%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
249
of 249 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
249 (13 August 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
1,425,850
Reactions total
5,248
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,800
Videos
≈244
Links
≈5,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,248 reactions across 249 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 3.51% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
184
3.51%
🎄
179
3.41%
🥰
173
3.30%
🙏
167
3.18%
🦄
163
3.11%
🐳
156
2.97%
🤷
155
2.95%
🍾
153
2.92%
💯
152
2.90%
😇
151
2.88%
🌭
149
2.84%
💋
142
2.71%
😎
142
2.71%
🤩
141
2.69%
🤗
132
2.52%
🔥
131
2.50%
🍓
130
2.48%
🎉
130
2.48%
🤓
130
2.48%
😁
126
2.40%
34 further kinds
2,262
43.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 249 of the 249 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.01%
5 of 249 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
3,970
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,770
over 244 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 249 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
📈 Tired of missing the run-ups? This feed charges before the bulls do.
No filters. No fluff. Just raw market intel.
🔥 @bullbrief — Bull Market Digest delivers:
• Laser-sharp crypto insights daily
• BTC, ETH, and altcoin setups with bite
• Trend signals, early momentum & bullish narratives
• Built for real traders, not spectators
🐂 If you’re here to ride waves — this is your surf report.
👉 Subscribe before the nex…
Wow $10000 Bonus given to our users only in 7 days who deposited last week !
This is life changing free money .
Deposit Bonus
Volume Bonus
70% accurate vip signals
Free trading indicators
All for Free in Our VIP group ..
Join Now only condition join YUBIT or WEEX and deposit $100 in your account and join VIP group .
ALl more info on VIP GROUP BOT :
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
I didnot took this trade CLAUDE DID IT FOR ME ON INDICATOR I BUILD !
This is same indicator which showed us 80% WIN RATE ! Testing on forward test now on real funds 💥💥🫶🫶
Crypto Signal Hub
📢Harvard economist Ken Rogoff warns that the U.S. could face a debt crisis as rising debt and political constraints make fiscal reforms increasingly difficult.
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
Check this data so you know how powerful was our 24 days VIP group Calls !
23% return on your wallet so if you had $10000 could have made $2300 profit on just 1% risk per trade .
And 69% profit if it was 3 % risk per trade !
This is just start for us guys !
- Free signals every day are shared !
- Indicators will be released soon i am just testing them daily .
If you want to join VIP group then just join our BOT a…
📢Deutsche Bank expects the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates in both September and December.
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
🇺🇸🇻🇪TRUMP JUST CALLED IT “THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY.”
But the real story isn't just about Venezuela producing more oil.
This deal could reshape:
➡️U.S. energy security
➡️Russia's oil leverage
➡️China's access to cheap crude
➡️OPEC+ supply dynamics
➡️And potentially even the future of Iran
Here's the bigger picture 👇
💬 https://x.com/wiseadvicesumit/status/2093941018634670420
Crypto Signal Hub
🇺🇸🇯🇵U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that disorderly yen moves could trigger forced unwinds and destabilize global markets.
➡️A sharp yen move could push U.S. borrowing costs higher.
➡️Bessent defended the recent U.S.-Japan currency intervention.
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
📢Crypto hacks are increasing, while insurance coverage has dropped from $163.2M to $130.2M.
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
🇺🇸Russia’s largest bank Sberbank plans to accept Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDT as collateral for loans, subject to regulatory approval.
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @wiseadvicetrade_bot
Crypto Signal Hub
🎃3⚡2😁2🐳1💋1🤓1🦄1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 249 posts we hold for @wisesignal5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 151,510 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Signal Hub” (@wisesignal5), 37,015 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wisesignal5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.